1997
DOI: 10.1029/97wr01233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence of dynamic scaling and indications of self‐organized criticality in braided rivers

Abstract: Abstract. The evolution of an experimental braided river produced in our laboratory has been monitored and analyzed. It has been shown that in addition to the spatial scaling revealed by Sapozhnikov and Foufoula-Georgiou [1996a], braided rivers also exhibit dynamic scaling. This implies that a smaller part of a braided river evolves identically (in the statistical sense) to a larger one provided the time is renormalized by a factor depending only on the ratio of the spatial scales of those parts. The small val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exceedance probability, characterizing drainage organization and network connectivity, of upstream contributing areas is presented in Figure 4 showing a power law of slope 2 0.5 very similar to that of real landscapes [see e.g., Rodr ıguez-Iturbe et al, 1992; Rigon et al, 1996]. As previously noted by Hasbargen and Paola [2003] for experimental tributary networks and Sapozhnikov and Foufoula-Georgiou [1997] for experimental braided river networks, during steady state, our landscape exhibited a notable degree of internal variability (dynamic steady state) although the average basin erosion rate remained constant (see Figure 2 and also Reinhardt and Ellis [2015]). …”
Section: Physical Characteristics Of the Evolved Landscape At Steady mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The exceedance probability, characterizing drainage organization and network connectivity, of upstream contributing areas is presented in Figure 4 showing a power law of slope 2 0.5 very similar to that of real landscapes [see e.g., Rodr ıguez-Iturbe et al, 1992; Rigon et al, 1996]. As previously noted by Hasbargen and Paola [2003] for experimental tributary networks and Sapozhnikov and Foufoula-Georgiou [1997] for experimental braided river networks, during steady state, our landscape exhibited a notable degree of internal variability (dynamic steady state) although the average basin erosion rate remained constant (see Figure 2 and also Reinhardt and Ellis [2015]). …”
Section: Physical Characteristics Of the Evolved Landscape At Steady mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In a subsequent paper [10] they demonstrated the manner in which these models also capture the effects of random influences in driving the processes of landscape evolution. In particular, their results provided a physical basis for explaining various fundamental scaling relationships [44,70,55,42,60,61,59,48,54,69,62,58,32,56,21,22] that characterize fluvial landscapes and supply a bridge between deterministic and stochastic theories of drainage basin evolution.…”
Section: Complexity In Geomorphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal of this study was to provide more concrete evidence which would support or disprove our earlier hypothesis that braided rivers are self-organized critical systems [Sapozhnikov and Foufoula-Georgiou, 1997]. This hypothesis was based on our finding that in the statistical equilibrium state our experimental braided river showed dynamic scaling, and also on the fact that braided rivers are nonlinear systems with a high number of degrees of freedom, which is typical of SOC systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As the river evolved, it was recovering from the initial vertical disturbance by approaching a profile of a quasi-equilibrium shape, and at the same time it was developing toward the final equilibrium profile. This final equilibrium profile obtained by Sapozhnikov and Foufoula-Georgiou [1997] under the same conditions (same water and sand supply) is known to have a uniform slope of 0.15. We notice here, however, that by the time the dynamic scaling in the system had been achieved, the river was far from its final equilibrium profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation