2007
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence of competitive release in sympatric carnivores

Abstract: Changes in the relative abundance of sympatric carnivores can have far-reaching ecological consequences, including the precipitation of trophic cascades and species declines. While such observations are compelling, experimental evaluations of interactions among carnivores remain scarce and are both logistically and ethically challenging. Carnivores are nonetheless a particular focus of management practices owing to their roles as predators of livestock and as vectors and reservoirs of zoonotic diseases. Here, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a growing body of field studies indicates that the phenomenon of mesopredator release is widespread among mammalian carnivore assemblages (e.g. Palomares et al 1995;Crooks & Soulé 1999;Trewby et al 2008) and appears to be particularly applicable to coexisting canids of differing body sizes such as dingoes and red foxes (Kamler et al 2003;Berger & Gese 2007). Given increasing support for the MRH and data on dingo -fox interactions (Newsome et al 2001;Letnic 2007;Johnson & Van Der Wal 2009; this study), we have no reason to believe that the outcomes of interactions between dingoes and foxes, and the prey of foxes, should not accord with the MRH.…”
Section: Discussion (A) the Effects Of Dingo Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a growing body of field studies indicates that the phenomenon of mesopredator release is widespread among mammalian carnivore assemblages (e.g. Palomares et al 1995;Crooks & Soulé 1999;Trewby et al 2008) and appears to be particularly applicable to coexisting canids of differing body sizes such as dingoes and red foxes (Kamler et al 2003;Berger & Gese 2007). Given increasing support for the MRH and data on dingo -fox interactions (Newsome et al 2001;Letnic 2007;Johnson & Van Der Wal 2009; this study), we have no reason to believe that the outcomes of interactions between dingoes and foxes, and the prey of foxes, should not accord with the MRH.…”
Section: Discussion (A) the Effects Of Dingo Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competitive interactions can be complex and shifts in their dynamics have resulted in unpredictable and sometimes profound impacts on lower trophic levels [3,4]. Compelling examples are emerging describing the deleterious impacts that subordinate predators, or mesopredators, inflict on prey species after being released from competition with a dominant predator [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Some instances of mesopredator release have yielded counterintuitive outcomes; for example, the removal of cats from an island resulted in a decline rather than an increase in the resident seabird colony because rats were released from regulation by cats, resulting in an increase in rat numbers and egg predation rates [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many plant communities are organized as transitive competitive hierarchies, in which superior competitors achieve the greatest abundance in the field (reviewed in Keddy 1990). Experimental studies of vertebrate (Heske et al 1994; Griffis and Jaeger 1998;Trewby et al 2008) and invertebrate (Race 1982;Kohler 1992;Andersen and Patel 1994) communities provide evidence for competitive release following the exclusion of a dominant, abundant species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%