1986
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/19/19/021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence for vacancy sharing between L subshells in very asymmetric ion-atom collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent work Padhi et al (1995) studied the ionization of the L subshell of Au and Bi through the impact of B ions in the energy range 0.48-0.88 MeV amu −1 . Their goal was to investigate further the anomalies which have been found in previous L-shell ionization works using heavy projectile ions (Li et al 1976, Sarkadi and Mukoyama 1980, Jitschin et al 1983a, b, 1985, Pálinkás et al 1983, Berinde et al 1984, Papp et al 1984, Dexheimer et al 1986, Kambara et al 1989, Semaniak et al 1994, Dhal et al 1995a. In these works large deviations (up to one order of magnitude in some cases) were observed between the measured cross section values (subshell cross section ratios) and the predictions of the first-order ionization theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a recent work Padhi et al (1995) studied the ionization of the L subshell of Au and Bi through the impact of B ions in the energy range 0.48-0.88 MeV amu −1 . Their goal was to investigate further the anomalies which have been found in previous L-shell ionization works using heavy projectile ions (Li et al 1976, Sarkadi and Mukoyama 1980, Jitschin et al 1983a, b, 1985, Pálinkás et al 1983, Berinde et al 1984, Papp et al 1984, Dexheimer et al 1986, Kambara et al 1989, Semaniak et al 1994, Dhal et al 1995a. In these works large deviations (up to one order of magnitude in some cases) were observed between the measured cross section values (subshell cross section ratios) and the predictions of the first-order ionization theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some attempts to improve sections can be overcome. the situation have been made, namely via the consider-We define empirical correction functions s s (x s ) as ation of intrashell transitions induced by the projectile 11,12 and measurement of the atomic parameters 13,14 used in V c 3 Å V 3 s 3 (x 3 ) the conversion from ionization to x-ray production cross sections and vice versa. Intrashell transitions are almost V c 2 Å V 2 s 2 (x 2 ) negligible for protons and the employment of different V c 1 Å V 1 s 1 (x 1 ).…”
Section: General Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such large differences are unlikely. According to [11] for colliding system with strong perturbation there is an effective vacancy sharing mechanism between the L-subshells during the collision process. As a result, we can expect a statistical population of the vacancies in a central collision.…”
Section: I(kl°)/i(kl1)/i(kla)/i(kl3)/i(kl 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%