2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.204502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evidence for the Existence of the Ultimate Regime in Rapidly Rotating Turbulent Thermal Convection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we consider the coupling effect of shear and buoyancy on the flow structure and heat and momentum transfer, that is, (Nu h , Nu ω ) = f (Ra, Ω). Therefore, referring to the results of our previous experiments and simulations of ACRBC (Jiang et al 2020(Jiang et al , 2022Wang et al 2022b), Pr = 4.3 is taken for water at 40 • C, and η is set to be 0.5. Considering the Boussinesq approximation, αΔ 1 is required.…”
Section: Other Numerical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, we consider the coupling effect of shear and buoyancy on the flow structure and heat and momentum transfer, that is, (Nu h , Nu ω ) = f (Ra, Ω). Therefore, referring to the results of our previous experiments and simulations of ACRBC (Jiang et al 2020(Jiang et al , 2022Wang et al 2022b), Pr = 4.3 is taken for water at 40 • C, and η is set to be 0.5. Considering the Boussinesq approximation, αΔ 1 is required.…”
Section: Other Numerical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the Boussinesq approximation, αΔ 1 is required. According to (2.2), we choose αΔ = 6.67 × 10 −3 and then Ro −1 = 20, which is also in the parameter range of our previous experiments, corresponding to a temperature difference Δ ≈ 17.3 K for water (Jiang et al 2020(Jiang et al , 2022. The non-Oberbeck-Boussinesq effect is not obvious at this temperature difference (Ahlers et al 2006), and the Oberbeck-Boussinesq conditions are well satisfied.…”
Section: Other Numerical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental or numerical observations of the (asymptotic) ultimate regime prove to be very difficult, and no final consensus has been reached so far about its existence in a pure RB setting (Doering & Constantin 1996;Chavanne et al 1997;Zhu et al 2018Zhu et al , 2019aUrban et al 2019;Roche 2020) (see Ahlers et al (2009) for a less recent but more synthetic review). When the gravity is artificially increased using centrifugal force, one can indeed observe hints of an ultimate regime (Jiang et al 2022). On the other hand, various modifications of the RB geometry aiming at modifying the influence of the boundary layers result in experimental observation of a regime where Nu ∼ Ra 1/2 : using highly elongated cells (Pawar & Arakeri 2016;Castaing et al 2017), using rough (Ciliberto & Laroche 1999;Rusaouën et al 2018;Zhu et al 2019b;Kawano et al 2021) or porous (Zou & Yang 2021;Motoki, Kawahara & Shimizu 2022) boundaries, or radiatively heating the flow (Lepot, Aumaître & Gallet 2018;Bouillaut et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the gravity is artificially increased using centrifugal force, one can indeed observe hints of an ultimate regime (Jiang et al. 2022). On the other hand, various modifications of the RB geometry aiming at modifying the influence of the boundary layers result in experimental observation of a regime where : using highly elongated cells (Pawar & Arakeri 2016; Castaing et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%