2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-005-0036-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence for selection against fish larvae with high metabolic rates in a food limited environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
100
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), and potential speciesspecific differences should be investigated further. The present study does not support the findings of Bochdansky et al (2005), who found that starving radiated shanny Ulvaria subbifurcata larvae with a relatively small otolith size-at-hatch survived longer than conspecifics with a relatively large otolith size-athatch. This highlights potentially important species differences.…”
Section: Starvation Resistancecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), and potential speciesspecific differences should be investigated further. The present study does not support the findings of Bochdansky et al (2005), who found that starving radiated shanny Ulvaria subbifurcata larvae with a relatively small otolith size-at-hatch survived longer than conspecifics with a relatively large otolith size-athatch. This highlights potentially important species differences.…”
Section: Starvation Resistancecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, otolith size-at-hatch has been used as a proxy for the predetermined standard metabolic rate (SMR) of the embryo (Bang et al 2004, Bang & Grønkjaer 2005. Bochdansky et al (2005) used this proxy to show that, when starved, radiated shanny Ulvaria subbifurcata larvae with a relatively small otolith size-at-hatch survived longer than conspecifics with a relatively large otolith size-at-hatch. Unfortunately, Bochansky et al (2005) did not test for a potential trade-off with growth rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of animal groups, including fishes, this variation appears to persist, at least in part, because tolerance of food deprivation trades off against a capacity for rapid growth, measured as rates of mass gain when feeding (Gotthard, 1998;Stoks et al, 2006;Scharf et al, 2009;Dupont-Prinet et al, 2010). It has been proposed that this trade-off has a straightforward physiological basis in fishes, as a direct consequence of different capacities for biosynthesis and growth (Bochdansky et al, 2005;Bang et al, 2007;Dupont-Prinet et al, 2010). Rapid growth brings ecological advantages if it allows individuals, particularly in their early life stages, to outgrow the gape of predators and out-compete conspecifics (Arendt, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they did differ in otolith size-at-hatching, where individuals from the LF treatment had larger otoliths at hatching than individuals from the HF treatment. The size of the otolith at hatching is indicative of differences in metabolic rates and individuals with larger otoliths at hatching have higher metabolic, and in turn, growth rates as embryos (Bang & Gronkjaer 2005;Bochdansky et al 2005). If this is the case, then our results clearly demonstrate that rapid growth during this early phase can compromise the developmental programme of individual fish larvae and result in correspondingly higher levels of otolith asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%