2022
DOI: 10.1002/cta.3374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of type‐2 fuzzy logic controller adapted to real environmental conditions for maximum power point tracking of solar energy systems

Abstract: The conventional angle of incremental conductance (AIC) method fails to track the maximum power point (MPP) when a rapid change in solar irradiation and/or panel temperature appears because it cannot distinguish between rapid changes in photovoltaic (PV) current and voltage under real environmental conditions. The present study describes setbacks of the conventional AIC method and proposes an effective approach based on the combination of AIC and type‐2 fuzzy. The proposed approach offers a significant advanta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the coefficient of variation, the patient factor has the largest coefficient of variation, while the system factor has a minimum coefficient of variation of 0.06. From the comparison of these values, it can be seen that system factors have the greatest impact, so relevant algorithms of artificial intelligence should be used to improve the nursing risk management system [8]. As shown in Figure 3, it can be seen from the data graph that among the system factors, the weight values of the organizational factors, institutional construction, management factors, and support systems in the secondary indicators are different, and the coefficient of variation is also different.…”
Section: Evaluation Of First Level Index Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the coefficient of variation, the patient factor has the largest coefficient of variation, while the system factor has a minimum coefficient of variation of 0.06. From the comparison of these values, it can be seen that system factors have the greatest impact, so relevant algorithms of artificial intelligence should be used to improve the nursing risk management system [8]. As shown in Figure 3, it can be seen from the data graph that among the system factors, the weight values of the organizational factors, institutional construction, management factors, and support systems in the secondary indicators are different, and the coefficient of variation is also different.…”
Section: Evaluation Of First Level Index Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%