Geo-Congress 2019 2019
DOI: 10.1061/9780784482100.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evaluation of Spatial Variability Effects on Liquefaction-Induced Settlements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, an exploratory study based on a series of medium-scale shake table tests was conducted at UNR to correlate the volume of the ejecta to the total settlement of the foundation. The results indicated a linear relationship between ejecta volume and total foundation settlement up to a threshold volume of ejecta, beyond which the increase in the volume of ejecta had no considerable impact on total liquefaction-induced foundation settlement [Jahed Orang et al 2019a]. In this study, it was difficult to measure the amount of ejecta due to the significant water flow to the ground surface; however, based on postshaking foundation settlement measurement, the ejecta appears to contribute up to 17% of the total settlement (i.e., 4.8 cm out of 28 cm).…”
Section: Comparison Of Observed and Estimated Foundation Settlementsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, an exploratory study based on a series of medium-scale shake table tests was conducted at UNR to correlate the volume of the ejecta to the total settlement of the foundation. The results indicated a linear relationship between ejecta volume and total foundation settlement up to a threshold volume of ejecta, beyond which the increase in the volume of ejecta had no considerable impact on total liquefaction-induced foundation settlement [Jahed Orang et al 2019a]. In this study, it was difficult to measure the amount of ejecta due to the significant water flow to the ground surface; however, based on postshaking foundation settlement measurement, the ejecta appears to contribute up to 17% of the total settlement (i.e., 4.8 cm out of 28 cm).…”
Section: Comparison Of Observed and Estimated Foundation Settlementsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The ejecta-induced settlement is manifested by the sand boils on the ground surface. The ground failure indices, along with the correlations between ejecta volume and foundation settlement, can be used to further quantify ejecta-induced settlement [Bray and Macedo 2017]; Jahed Orang et al 2019a]. Researchers have observed that much of the foundation settlement takes place during shaking, indicating a higher contribution of shear-induced mechanisms and partial drainage due to high hydraulic transient gradients [Dashti et al 2010a,b;Bray and Dashti 2014].…”
Section: Liquefaction-induced Foundation Settlementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in the Table 1, according to [9], soil types can be categorized based on their relative density. Loose soil tends to have the potential for liquefaction hazards.…”
Section: Relative Density (Rd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] assessed the reliability of 1D-Shaking table tests for studying liquefaction. [8][9][10][11][12] conducted shaking table tests to investigate large-scale liquefaction and post-liquefaction behaviour. Overall, these earlier studies have concluded that shaking table tests are a suitable method for modelling liquefaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%