1989
DOI: 10.1243/pime_proc_1989_203_072_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evaluation of ‘Shape from Shading’ for Engineering Component Profile Measurement

Abstract: This paper examines the application of the ‘shape from shading technique’ for three-dimensional surface geometry measurements and object inspection. The results for diffuse, specular and combined models are presented for a range of components exhibiting flat to highly curved surfaces. A more representative relationship between surface radiance and image intensity has been developed which, when incorporated in the models, is shown to change the accuracy of profile measurement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two models are used in the investigation, namely the intensity-topography compatibility (ITC) model [16], and the diffuse model [17]. The ITC model implies that the normalized values of pixel intensities within the image have a linear compatibility relationship with the normalized values of the surface height topography.…”
Section: Image Data Implementation For Surface Roughness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two models are used in the investigation, namely the intensity-topography compatibility (ITC) model [16], and the diffuse model [17]. The ITC model implies that the normalized values of pixel intensities within the image have a linear compatibility relationship with the normalized values of the surface height topography.…”
Section: Image Data Implementation For Surface Roughness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, ideal mirror surfaces reflect light only in the same angle of incidence relative to the surface normal. In practise, there is no ideal mirror surface or ideal dull surface; therefore it is not obvious how to evaluate the surface reflecting characteristics in an accurate way [15]. Table 1 The adopted surface roughness parameters General outlines for the adopted surface roughness parameters The adopted surface roughness parameters are computed from the data array denoted by GðnÞ; where n ¼ 1; 2; 3; !…”
Section: Image Data Implementation For Surface Roughness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a presents the lighting vector angle and b presents the surface normal angle where both are measured from the horizontal, Fig. (2), then [15]…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer vision has been shown to be of value in component recognition and inspection. Al-Kinidi et al [5] showed that the same data could have potential for surface texture assessment. The vision systems depend on acquiring an image of the surface to be tested and then analysing this image using the microcomputer facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%