2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2017.0079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of model predictive current control for a modified three‐level four‐leg indirect matrix converter

Abstract: This study presents an experimental validation and robustness evaluation of predictive current control and reactive power minimisation strategy for a three-level three-phase four-wire indirect matrix converter. The proposed topology features a unification of conventional four-leg indirect matrix converter with an additional four switches circuit resembling a back-to-back buck circuit to synthesise multi-level variable dual dc-link voltage. A systematic rectifier switching strategy is elaborated to ensure posit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on adding a dual-buck circuit, this topology enables the generation of three voltage levels at the inverter output side. This converter is available in two topologies, and three-leg [52] and four-leg [54] configurations. Figure 23 shows the three-leg configuration.…”
Section: Three-level Indirect Matrix Converter (3l-imc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on adding a dual-buck circuit, this topology enables the generation of three voltage levels at the inverter output side. This converter is available in two topologies, and three-leg [52] and four-leg [54] configurations. Figure 23 shows the three-leg configuration.…”
Section: Three-level Indirect Matrix Converter (3l-imc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An LC filter is connected between the input terminals of the rectifier stage and the ac‐source which mitigates high‐order harmonics produced by the commutation of the switches and avoids overvoltages. This is a second‐order model defined as [17], where the more relevant equations are Lnormalfdbold-italicinormalsdt=vsviRfis, Cnormalfdbold-italicvnormalidt=isii. The rectifier of the two‐stage converter must always generate a positive dc‐link voltage to ensure the correct operation of the converter and thus avoid any short circuit in the capacitors of the input filter. The voltage in the dc‐link vdc is defined by vdc=Tnormalrbold-italicvnormali, with Tnormalr the instantaneous transfer matrix of the input stage defined as Tnormalr=][Sr1Sr4Sr3Sr6Sr5Sr2. The current circulating in the input side of the two‐stage converter are defined by bold-italicinormali=TrnormalTidc. The current through the dc‐link, …”
Section: Mathematical Model Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea has been also extended for 4Leg‐IMCs [17]. A predictive current control strategy with minimisation of the instantaneous reactive power has been proposed for both the classical and three‐level four‐leg IMC, respectively, in [17, 18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, model predictive control (MPC) has been widely applied in power electronics and power drives because of the fast dynamic response, simple principle and easy implementation, such as three‐phase inverter [6, 7], pulse width modulation (PWM) rectifier [8, 9], matrix converter [10, 11], induction motor drive [12, 13] and PMSM drive [14]. In the traditional MPC, one voltage vector is applied during one sampling period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%