2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2013
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2013.6566771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of content distribution with NDN and HTTP

Abstract: Abstract-Content distribution is a primary activity on the Internet. Name-centric network architectures support content distribution intrinsically. Named Data Networking (NDN), one recent such scheme, names packets rather than end-hosts, thereby enabling packets to be cached and redistributed by routers. Among alternative name-based systems, HTTP is the most significant by any measure. A majority of today's content distribution services leverage the widely deployed HTTP infrastructure, such as web servers and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yuan et al presented an early study between HTTP and CCNx (an incarnation of the Information Centric Networking concepts) [5]. The work compares HTTP and CCNx and shows that in networks with very high drop rates (10% or more) NDN outperforms HTTP.…”
Section: B Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuan et al presented an early study between HTTP and CCNx (an incarnation of the Information Centric Networking concepts) [5]. The work compares HTTP and CCNx and shows that in networks with very high drop rates (10% or more) NDN outperforms HTTP.…”
Section: B Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) since HTTP is a name-centric protocol that is widely used to retrieve content named by URL [28]. Indeed, as HTTP has high affinity with NDN, some research efforts are de-270 rived from HTTP/NDN [29,30]. Yuan et al [31] defined NDN flow using a name, and each flow was maintained by the expiration time and a list of incoming faces.…”
Section: Conversion Of Http To Ndn Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though NULL mode does not involve the process of segment authentication, it has a limited transmission performance. That is because in CCNx protocol execution content name encoding/decoding procedure is significantly time consuming [26,27]. TLDA with 1024-bit (resp., 2048-bit) key size provides the best performance of 76.506 Mbps (resp., 75.956 Mbps) when MHT size is 16 (resp., 64) while CCNx with 1024-bit (resp., 2048-bit) key size offers the best performance of 55.356 Mbps (resp., 40.571 Mbps) when MHT size is 32 (resp.…”
Section: Computational Performance and Overhead Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%