2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of coaxial horizontal axis hydrokinetic composite turbine system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows that the Eppler hydrofoil family is of great research interest and that the Cp found varies between 0,27 and 0,42. This is supported by the results of this work, whose experimental finding coincides with Abutunis et al (2020), while the numerical one agrees with Aguilar et al (2021). Finally, it is highlighted that the numerical Cp between 0,33 and 0,51 are higher than the experimental ones between 0,27 and 0,45, this study being conclusive as to the cause of the difference.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 shows that the Eppler hydrofoil family is of great research interest and that the Cp found varies between 0,27 and 0,42. This is supported by the results of this work, whose experimental finding coincides with Abutunis et al (2020), while the numerical one agrees with Aguilar et al (2021). Finally, it is highlighted that the numerical Cp between 0,33 and 0,51 are higher than the experimental ones between 0,27 and 0,45, this study being conclusive as to the cause of the difference.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…1,2 5 0,51 (Gish et al, 2020) Exp NACA4412 0,91-1,52 0,265 4 0,33 (Abutunis et al, 2020) Exp Eppler 395 0,98 0,109 5 0,27 (Nachtane et al, 2020) Num NTS-XX20 2 -6,5 0,51 (Kirke, 2020 Thereupon, this article is structured as follows. The first section shows the way in which the CFD simulation was configured.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%