2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of catalyst layers with bimodal pore structure for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffusivities of species in wax were estimated from Akgerman's correlation. 50,51 This correlation has been used previously, 6,21 and its predictions are similar to those obtained using correlations of Wang et al 5 and Makrodimitri et al 52 The effective diffusivity of the component was calculated from…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Diffusivities of species in wax were estimated from Akgerman's correlation. 50,51 This correlation has been used previously, 6,21 and its predictions are similar to those obtained using correlations of Wang et al 5 and Makrodimitri et al 52 The effective diffusivity of the component was calculated from…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…With the ASF-distribution alone a common behaviour of FT catalyst to exhibit an overly high methane selectivity, also observed in our previous experimental work, 22 cannot be predicted and a modification is required. A simple, yet rigorous modification comes by Förtsch et al, 51 which introduces only one further constant that describes the enhanced termination probability for methane.…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[24][25][26] By using transport pores the internal diffusion is enhanced and can improve the observed selectivities, as shown in the group of Montes 18,27 and also by our previous work. 22 Our existing simulation work 28 predicts the improved selectivity but also predicts an improved total productivity, which does not agree well with the experimental evidence. This can be a result of the simplified model, not taking axial convection into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations