2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2007.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of attachment behaviors in owned cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
50
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the experimental setup of this study, social rub (also called bunting or allorubbing) is a more appropriate contextualization of the behaviour, since it was focused on the human-cat interaction. In domestic cats, rubbing behaviour is directed more towards owners than strangers (Edwards et al, 2007) and so could be an adaptation to interact with humans to obtain investment (Shreve and Udell, 2015). Cats seem to prefer being stroked by humans in specific facial areas (temporal region) and since humans do not use face or body rub as part of their normal species social repertoire, stroking (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the experimental setup of this study, social rub (also called bunting or allorubbing) is a more appropriate contextualization of the behaviour, since it was focused on the human-cat interaction. In domestic cats, rubbing behaviour is directed more towards owners than strangers (Edwards et al, 2007) and so could be an adaptation to interact with humans to obtain investment (Shreve and Udell, 2015). Cats seem to prefer being stroked by humans in specific facial areas (temporal region) and since humans do not use face or body rub as part of their normal species social repertoire, stroking (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cats were observed during each event, and a number of attachment behaviors were scored including independent behaviors, such as locomotion/exploration, vigilance, inactivity and approaching the door, and interactive behaviors, including physical contact, allorubbing, playing and vocalizing with the owner or stranger. Edwards et al (2007) found there were significant differences in the cats' behavior when cats were alone, with their owner or with a stranger. Cats spent significantly more time in contact with and allorubbing their owner compared with the stranger.…”
Section: Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, secure attachments also allow individuals, be they humans or non-human animals, to feel comfortable in new settings and explore their environment (Ainsworth and Bell 1970). Edwards et al (2007) used an adaptation of the Ainsworth Strange Situation Test (Ainsworth et al 1978) to examine attachment between pet cats and their owners. In this test, the cat was exposed to seven events that alternated the presence and absence of an owner and stranger in the testing room, with two reunion events between the owner and cat: an introductory event to become familiar with the testing room, (1) an event between only the owner and cat, (2) an event between stranger, owner and cat where owner left at end of event, (3) an event with only stranger and cat, (4) an event when owner and cat are reunited with no stranger present, (5) an event with the cat alone in the testing room, (6) an event where the stranger re-entered the room and (7) a second reunion event between the owner and cat.…”
Section: Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyze the behavioral characteristics, the cats that are with their owners for a while, newly adopted ones, and the stray cats were considered as samples. Moreover, their interactions and behavioral changes were observed [21].…”
Section: Arthi and Fathimamentioning
confidence: 99%