2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.0933-7407.2003.00930.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of antifungal and antiseptic agents against Rhodotorula spp.

Abstract: We studied the susceptibility of 21 strains of Rhodotorula rubra and nine strains of R. glutinis to eight antifungals and tested eight antiseptic agents on one strain of R. rubra. The tested strains were susceptible to ketoconazole, 5-fluorocytosine, amphotericin B, and nystatin, intermediate to econazole and resistant to fluconazole, itraconazole and miconazole. After 5-min contact, six of the eight antiseptic agents tested showed a fungicidal activity on the tested R. rubra strain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2 (1%) isolates of Rhodotorula glutinis showed a range of 6-13 mm of zone diameter to both fluconazole and voriconazole, which is consistent with other studies. [30][31][32][33] The germ tube method used to confirm C. albicans in this study, although accepted for non-sterile site isolates, is not sufficiently accurate when confirming these isolates as misidentifications are a distinct possibility, e.g. C. dubliniensis isolates might be misidentified as C. albicans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The 2 (1%) isolates of Rhodotorula glutinis showed a range of 6-13 mm of zone diameter to both fluconazole and voriconazole, which is consistent with other studies. [30][31][32][33] The germ tube method used to confirm C. albicans in this study, although accepted for non-sterile site isolates, is not sufficiently accurate when confirming these isolates as misidentifications are a distinct possibility, e.g. C. dubliniensis isolates might be misidentified as C. albicans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Rhodotorula bloodstream infections have been successfully managed with line removal alone, antifungal therapy without line removal, and with a combination of these approaches (7,10). Regarding choice of antifungal therapy, previously reported data have shown amphotericin B and flucytosine (5-FC) to have good in vitro activities and fluconazole and the echinocandins to have poor in vitro activities (2,5,6,20,23). However, most reports describe fewer than 10 organisms, not all utilize standard NCCLS methodology, and only a few report data on the newer extended-spectrum triazoles (2,5,6,23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhodotorula species are in general considered as safe for humans, although some species have been reported to cause opportunistic infections, especially in tropical and subtropical climates (Preney et al 2003). Rhodotorula has been used for the production of carotenes (Bhosale and Gadre 2001) and Naidu et al (1999) have clearly shown that oral feeding of frozen whole cells of Rhodotorula gracilis did not produce any toxic effects on male and female rats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%