2013
DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-0920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evaluation of Advanced Turbocharger Performance on a Light Duty Diesel Engine

Abstract: Engine manufacturers are continually faced with the challenges of meeting more stringent emission regulations while maintaining the customer requirements for fuel economy improvement. This challenge has required future turbochargers to have good efficiency at low flow area and sufficient surge margin, while customer demand and market competition drive for high power or high power density characteristics. This combination of competing requirements translates into turbocharger designs that have high efficiency o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is verified using the experimental data from steady-state tests performed on a heavy-duty turbocharged diesel engine. 26,27 The entire engine operational range is mapped via 195 steady-state speed and load points. The vane position is based on the turbocharger control signal u vgt and varies from the fully closed position to the fully open position.…”
Section: Turbocharger Mechanical Loss Model and Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is verified using the experimental data from steady-state tests performed on a heavy-duty turbocharged diesel engine. 26,27 The entire engine operational range is mapped via 195 steady-state speed and load points. The vane position is based on the turbocharger control signal u vgt and varies from the fully closed position to the fully open position.…”
Section: Turbocharger Mechanical Loss Model and Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the "fast-slow" loading strategies with 50% and even bigger 50% CPL (e.g., Strategies 4,5,7,8,10,and 11), the average ratio of fuel consumption, soot and CO in transient process increased to different degrees, and the biggest increase of strategy 11 is 9%, 92.2% and 65.3%, respectively. This is because of the above loading strategies (strategy 4,5,7,8,10,11). Due to the rapid oil supply rate in the early period and the long duration of high speed injection, the AFR in the early transient process decreases rapidly and causes the larger anoxic environment in the cylinder.…”
Section: Influence Of Non-linear Loading Strategies On Comprehensive mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The emission performance under the non-linear loading strategy is better than that under the linear loading strategy, if the κ is a negative, and vice versa. However, the smoke and CO emissions deteriorated under the "fast-slow" loading strategies with overlarge CPLs (e.g., Strategies 4,5,7,8,10,and 11), and the emissions increase as the ELR and CPL increase. For example, the peak values of smoke and CO emissions are 40.1% and 926 ppm and the increasing rates are 449.3% and 122.5% in Strategy 11, respectively, which demonstrates that the emissions performance seriously deteriorates.…”
Section: Influence Of Non-linear Loading Strategies On Emission Perfomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both VGT and EGR valve controllers are map based with gain scheduled Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers. Detailed engine and turbocharger model validation results can be found in [24].The performance of the vehicle system simulator is shown through the tracking of the desired vehicle velocity trajectory in Figure 7.…”
Section: Simulation Platform and Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%