2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation and constitutive modeling of non-proportional deformation for asymmetric steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, three theoretical yield functions (von Mises, r-Hill [6], and Varma [5]) were determined. Verma's yield function is defined as; Anisotropic parameters of this function can be explicitly determined using the uniaxial tensile test data in 3 directions, compression test data in 2 directions and bi-axial tensile test data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, three theoretical yield functions (von Mises, r-Hill [6], and Varma [5]) were determined. Verma's yield function is defined as; Anisotropic parameters of this function can be explicitly determined using the uniaxial tensile test data in 3 directions, compression test data in 2 directions and bi-axial tensile test data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verma's yield function is defined as; Anisotropic parameters of this function can be explicitly determined using the uniaxial tensile test data in 3 directions, compression test data in 2 directions and bi-axial tensile test data. Parameter identification method is shown in literature [5]. Using Verma's model, the SD effect was successfully reproduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for predicting such defects accurately, it is required to characterize the deformation behavior, especially under non-monotonous/non-proportional deformation conditions, and to develop constitutive equations suitable for describing observed deformation behaviors. [1][2][3] It is increasingly agreed in the research community working on sheet forming that experimentation and modeling under non-monotonous/non-proportional deformation conditions are important for accuracy in forming simulations and in the performance prediction of sheet products. Researchers have performed experiments using many different strain paths and evaluated the deformation behavior under such conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model based on combined isotropic-kinematic hardening with permanent softening 1) was utilized to simulate the deformation behavior under such deformation conditions and it was found that the above model was capable of correctly predicting the deformations for both cases considered here. It was also noticed that the incorporation of permanent softening often observed during reverse loading, is important for accurately predicting the deformation when bending-unbending (or strain reversals) takes place.KEY WORDS: non-proportional; 2D draw bend; permanent softening; combined isotropic-kinematic hardening.experiments on an ultra low carbon steel, for different combinations of cross tests and tension-compression tests and also proposed modifications to the combined hardening model of Chung et al 1,28) It was observed for this particular steel that, during the cross test, the hardening curve finally converges to the original monotonic curve suggesting that the isotropic hardening might be good enough (excepting the cross effect observed initially before converging to the original curve) to model the hardening behavior during cross tests. However, it was not clear, whether the hardening curve will saturate to the original monotonic curve even for more complex strain paths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%