Recent progress in experimental triplet phase determination by the method of three-beam diffraction for 0108-7673/90/050393-10503.00 non-centrosymmetric light-atom structures is reported. The measurements were carried out with a special 0-circle diffractometer installed at the DORIS II storage ring in Hamburg. Experimental results O 1990 International Union of Crystallography 394 DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF TRIPLET PHASE RELATIONSHIPS confirm the theoretical considerations. In general, the ~-scan profiles consist of a phase-independent Umweganregung or AuJhellung part superimposed on a phase-dependent part due to the three-beam interference, which contains the phase information.Experimentally, Umweganregung and Aufhellung effects can be evaluated by comparison of the two centrosymmetrically related three-beam cases. It is shown that with moderate phase-independent effects the triplet phase can be determined with an accuracy of about 45 ° .
IntroductionIn a recent paper (Hiimmer, Weckert & Bondza, 1989) we reported the direct measurements of triplet phases by means of three-beam interference experiments for two non-centrosymmetric test structures with relatively small unit cells using Cu radiation from a rotating-anode generator. It was shown that the threebeam interference effect leads to typical 0-scan profiles for triplet phases near 0, 180, +90 or -90 °.On the other hand, the theoretical considerations in the preceding paper (Weckert & Hiimmer, 1990) show that it should be possible to achieve a higher precision in experimental triplet phase determination in spite of phase-independent Umweganregung and Aufhellung effects superimposed on the interference effect. The three-beam interference between the primary diffracted wave and the Umweg wave gives rise to the typical 'ideal' 0-scan profiles which carry the phase information. It should be possible to evaluate the troublesome Umweganregung and Aufhellung effects by comparing the 0-scan profiles of two centrosymmetrically related three-beam cases 0/h/g and O/-h/-g which involve equal triples of structurefactor magnitudes but triplet phases of opposite sign if anomalous-dispersion effects can be neglected. However, because of the experimental systematic uncertainties the Umweganregung and Aufhellung should be avoided. Thus, the basic requirement for this procedure is that the primary, secondary and the coupling reflections have nearly equal intensities.Our method of quantitative determination of triplet phases is in some important aspects different from that proposed by Shen & Colella (1988) and Tang & Chang (1988).In the experiments of Shen & Collella the intensity change of very weak primary reflections caused by strong multiple reflections is used. The phase information is obtained from the asymmetry in the wings of the multiple-reflection peaks which are dominated by strong Umweganregung. The asymmetry decreases with decreasing cosine of the triplet phase. So the authors stated that only cos ~b can be determined.In the paper of Tang & Chang (1988) the ...