2019
DOI: 10.1002/kin.21342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of the rate constants of the reactions of HO2 + DO2 and DO2 + DO2

Abstract: The rate constants of the reactions of DO 2 + HO 2 (R1) and DO 2 + DO 2 (R2) have been determined by the simultaneous, selective, and quantitative measurement of HO 2 and DO 2 by continuous wave cavity ring-down spectroscopy (cw-CRDS) in the near infrared, coupled to a radical generation by laser photolysis. HO 2 was generated by photolyzing Cl 2 in the presence of CH 3 OH and O 2 . Low concentrations of DO 2 were generated simultaneously by adding low concentrations of D 2 O to the reaction mixture, leading t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometric mean value rule is an empirical approach that allows for the estimation of cross-reaction rate coefficients from the self-recombination rate constants of the reacting partners 68 It has shown to work to better than 20% in the prediction of radical–radical rate coefficients for a series of hydrocarbon radicals 69 and has proven to be valid also for the cross reaction of HO 2 and DO 2 radicals. 70 When applying this rule to the cross reaction of CH 3 O 2 and C 2 H 5 O 2 and using the values for the self-reactions from Table 3, one obtains an excellent agreement ( k 1,geometric rule = 3.74 × 10 −13 cm 3 s −1 ) with the rate constant obtained in this work. However, when using the value for the CH 3 O 2 self-reaction recently obtained by Onel et al , 12 the geometric mean rule predicts a rate constant for the cross reaction of only k 1 = 2.9 × 10 −13 cm 3 s −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The geometric mean value rule is an empirical approach that allows for the estimation of cross-reaction rate coefficients from the self-recombination rate constants of the reacting partners 68 It has shown to work to better than 20% in the prediction of radical–radical rate coefficients for a series of hydrocarbon radicals 69 and has proven to be valid also for the cross reaction of HO 2 and DO 2 radicals. 70 When applying this rule to the cross reaction of CH 3 O 2 and C 2 H 5 O 2 and using the values for the self-reactions from Table 3, one obtains an excellent agreement ( k 1,geometric rule = 3.74 × 10 −13 cm 3 s −1 ) with the rate constant obtained in this work. However, when using the value for the CH 3 O 2 self-reaction recently obtained by Onel et al , 12 the geometric mean rule predicts a rate constant for the cross reaction of only k 1 = 2.9 × 10 −13 cm 3 s −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%