2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4871808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of radiated internal wave power without pressure field data

Abstract: We present a method to determine, using only velocity field data, the time-averaged energy flux J and total radiated power P for two-dimensional internal gravity waves. Both J and P are determined from expressions involving only a scalar function, the stream function ψ. We test the method using data from a direct numerical simulation for tidal flow of a stratified fluid past a knife edge. The results for the radiated internal wave power given by the stream function method agree to within 0.5% with results obta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the transformation (10), the boundary conditions on p, (15) and (17), imply the following boundary conditions on the variable q:…”
Section: A Energy Flux From a Density Perturbation Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the transformation (10), the boundary conditions on p, (15) and (17), imply the following boundary conditions on the variable q:…”
Section: A Energy Flux From a Density Perturbation Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finite-volume based solver implements a fractional-step time-marching scheme, with subgrid modeling deactivated. The code has been validated in previous laboratory and computational studies of internal waves [9,15,[25][26][27].…”
Section: A Navier-stokes Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations use the CDP-2.4 algorithm, which is a finite volume solver that implements a fractional-step time-marching scheme (Ham & Iaccarino 2004;Mahesh et al 2004). This code has previously been used to simulate internal waves and has been validated with experiments (King et al 2009;Lee et al 2014;Dettner et al 2013;Zhang & Swinney 2014;Paoletti et al 2014;Allshouse et al 2016).…”
Section: Simulation Of the Density Perturbation Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method assumed a constant buoyancy frequency and calculated the energy flux (averaged over a tidal period) given only the stream function, thus eliminating the need to measure the pressure perturbation field (Balmforth et al 2002). The stream function method was subsequently extended to a buoyancy frequency varying exponentially with depth Lee et al (2014). Another method applied the polarization relations to density perturbation data to obtain estimates for the velocity and pressure perturbation amplitudes (Clark & Sutherland 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our PIV velocity field measurements, we calculate the energy flux field for the different frequency components using a recently established method. 17 First, the stream function field ψ(x, z) is obtained from the two-dimensional velocity field data via the relation (u, w) = (−∂ z ψ, ∂ x ψ) and path integration. The stream function field, as well as the background density and wave frequency, are subsequently incorporated into the expression for energy flux,…”
Section: -4 Ghaemsaidi Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%