2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of oxygen diffusion in liquid iron at high pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, calculated D Fe values are 2–4 times slower that D O , consistent with previous studies on liquid iron alloys with low oxygen contents ( X O 0.2) [ Pozzo et al , ; Ichikawa and Tsuchiya , ]. Low pressure results are in good agreement with experimental oxygen diffusion data at 7 GPa [ Posner et al , ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, calculated D Fe values are 2–4 times slower that D O , consistent with previous studies on liquid iron alloys with low oxygen contents ( X O 0.2) [ Pozzo et al , ; Ichikawa and Tsuchiya , ]. Low pressure results are in good agreement with experimental oxygen diffusion data at 7 GPa [ Posner et al , ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, experiments and computations on the diffusivities of Si and Fe show the expected behavior of a reasonably strong pressure dependence, as expressed through their activation volumes (Δ V ~ 0.4 cm 3 mol −1 ) [ Posner et al , ], defined as lnDP=normalΔVRT0.75em, where D is the diffusion coefficient and R is the universal gas constant. By contrast, oxygen diffusion experiments up to 18 GPa show a negligible pressure effect (Δ V = 0.1 ± 0.1 cm 3 mol −1 ) [ Posner et al , ] and a computational study on the transport and structural properties of Fe–FeO liquid reports only a slightly larger pressure effect (Δ V ~ 0.3 cm 3 mol −1 ) [ Ichikawa and Tsuchiya , ]. However, the simulations were conducted at pressures above 100 GPa only, which is far beyond the pressure range accessible in the experiments and therefore provide little basis for a reasonable comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion of hydrogen in the liquid core is much faster than in solid silicates. Our nominal value for its diffusivity in the core is D H,C = 1.2 × 10 −7 m 2 /s, which is 20 times the diffusivity of oxygen in liquid iron at 20 GPa and 2000 K inferred from recent experiments (Posner et al, ). The plausible range for D H,C extends from ~1.4 × 10 −7 m 2 /s as measured at ~1873 K and ambient pressure (Depuydt & Parlee, ) to ~8 × 10 −8 m 2 /s for Earth's core at 4400 K and 130 GPa from first‐principles calculations (Umemoto & Hirose, ).…”
Section: Theory and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Several previous studies (e.g., Posner, Rubie, Frost, & Steinle‐Neumann, ; Rubie et al, ; Samuel, ) report that a centimeter‐scale maximum radius of iron‐rich metallic droplets (e.g., diffusion distance D) is required to achieve full metal‐silicate equilibration assuming a diffusion coefficient D ~ 10 −8 m 2 ·s −1 . As we demonstrate here, the kinetics of chemical equilibration depends on the species ϕ, and shorter (longer) equilibration times are required for alloying elements with faster (slower) D ϕ .…”
Section: Implications For Planetary Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%