Experimental Determination of Isotope Enrichment Factors – Bias from Mass Removal by Repetitive Sampling

Abstract

Application of compound-specific stable isotope approaches often involves comparisons of isotope enrichment factors (ε). Experimental determination of ε-values is based on the Rayleigh equation, which relates the change in measured isotope ratios to the decreasing substrate fractions and is valid for closed systems. Even in well-controlled batch experiments, however, this requirement is not necessarily fulfilled, since repetitive sampling can remove a significant fraction of the analyte. For volatile compounds the need for appropriate corrections is most evident, and various methods have been proposed to account for mass removal and for volatilization into the headspace. In this study we use both synthetic and experimental data to demonstrate that the determination of ε-values according to current correction methods is prone to considerable systematic errors even in well-designed experimental setups. Application of inappropriate methods may lead to incorrect and inconsistent ε-values entailing misinterpretations regarding the processes underlying isotope fractionation. In fact, our results suggest that artifacts arising from inappropriate data evaluation might contribute to the variability of published ε-values. In response, we present novel, adequate methods to eliminate systematic errors in data evaluation. A model-based sensitivity analysis serves to reveal the most crucial experimental parameters and can be used for future experimental design to obtain correct ε-values allowing mechanistic interpretations.

Sources of Uncertainty in Biotransformation Mechanistic Interpretations and Remediation Studies using CSIA

“…Prominent examples of this effort in environmental research include the EPA guide that outlines best practices for using CSIA in contaminant hydrogeology; 1 an analysis of total uncertainty incorporating both accuracy and reproducibility for baseline GC-IRMS measurements; 32 and identification of bias introduced during sampling for CSIA measurements. 39 One substantial challenge facing dual-isotope plots is the lack of community consensus on calculating and comparing Λ with appropriate error. The objective of this paper is to address these issues.…”

Direct and indirect photodegradation of atrazine and S-metolachlor in agriculturally impacted surface water and associated C and N isotope fractionation

“…Correction of 𝜀 𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘 accounting for repetitive sampling in batch experiments were deemed irrelevant here as they systematically fell within the regression confidence interval. 31 In addition to 𝜀 𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘 , dual-isotope plots with 𝛿 15 𝑁 versus 𝛿 13 𝐶 (𝛬 𝑁/𝐶 , eq. 4), reflecting changes of the isotope ratios of each element, were established to compare transformation pathways in laboraratory experiments and the environment.…”

A modeling approach integrating microbial activity, mass transfer, and geochemical processes to interpret biological assays: An example for PCE degradation in a multi-phase batch setup

“…where n i,t [mol] is the remaining mass of compound i and V S,aq [L] is the volume of the removed sample. The concentrations of the compound in each phase after sample removal was then calculated (Buchner et al, 2016) using the partition coefficients K gas-org and K org-aq [-] (Table S2).…”

“…Sequential sampling also impacts the mass balance in the system. If an experimental system is small or if the amount of sample removed is relatively large, the removal of mass by this mechanism must also be considered since it affects the distribution of the different fluid phases in the setup (Buchner et al, 2016;Buttet et al, 2018).…”