2006
DOI: 10.1038/nature04627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of entanglement with a single measurement

Abstract: Nearly all protocols requiring shared quantum information--such as quantum teleportation or key distribution--rely on entanglement between distant parties. However, entanglement is difficult to characterize experimentally. All existing techniques for doing so, including entanglement witnesses or Bell inequalities, disclose the entanglement of some quantum states but fail for other states; therefore, they cannot provide satisfactory results in general. Such methods are fundamentally different from entanglement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
348
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
348
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the recent proposals to directly measure the dissipative entanglement evolution have opened up a possibility of experimentally demonstrating the onset of the non-additivity when nonlocal coherence decay is concerned [27,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the recent proposals to directly measure the dissipative entanglement evolution have opened up a possibility of experimentally demonstrating the onset of the non-additivity when nonlocal coherence decay is concerned [27,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, somewhat surprisingly, it was shown how to estimate and/or even measure amount of entanglement (concurrence) without prior state reconstruction [11,12,13]. Recently the method got the new twist thanks to application of such collective measurements [20,21,22,23] that are directly related to quantum concurrence (see [24]) including photon polarization-momentum experimental demonstration for pure states in distant laboratories paradigm [20]. Recently collective entanglement witnesses were also shown to lead to easily measurable lower bounds on entanglement [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative route to enhance the size of a system is through hyperentanglement [8], that is, the entanglement in multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) of a composite quantum system. So far, hyperentanglement has found use in high-capacity quantum communication [9][10][11][12][13], photonic quantum computing [14,15], tests of quantum non-locality [16,17], and the direct characterization of entanglement [18] and quantum dynamics [19]. Here we demonstrate the usefulness of hyperentanglement in metrology, allowing one to reach the ultimate quantum precision limits, for the paradigmatic case of an interaction between two degrees of freedom of the same system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%