2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental designs of field-based constructed floating wetland studies: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two grams of L. minor (Liu et al., 2018) were exposed to MB-contaminated water at room temperature (20 °C–25 °C) under white lamp light at the approximation of 10,000–25,000 lux (Al-Baldawi et al., 2018). The reactor was designed to replicate the floating treatment wetland under batch system reactor (Lucke et al., 2019). The researchers ensured that all plant roots reached the bottom of the reactor during the test to accommodate the root sorption capability and the rhizosphere removal mechanisms (Almuktar et al., 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two grams of L. minor (Liu et al., 2018) were exposed to MB-contaminated water at room temperature (20 °C–25 °C) under white lamp light at the approximation of 10,000–25,000 lux (Al-Baldawi et al., 2018). The reactor was designed to replicate the floating treatment wetland under batch system reactor (Lucke et al., 2019). The researchers ensured that all plant roots reached the bottom of the reactor during the test to accommodate the root sorption capability and the rhizosphere removal mechanisms (Almuktar et al., 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this multi-stage process starts with biofilm formation [51]. Biofilm designation, in the context of FWI, is often attributed to the microbial development associated to the plant roots and its role on the water depurative process [7,52]. Therefore, both types of samples were considered.…”
Section: Assessment Of Microbial Diversity In the Fwi And Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi et al (2019) provided a broad overview of pollutant removal mechanisms and reported removal rates for a wide variety of compounds, and conclude that additional work is needed to understand how treatment efficiencies and other ecosystem effects mediated by FTWs may respond to changes in climate and pollutant delivery. Lucke, Walker, and Beecham (2019) presented a set of recommendations to improve robustness of experimental designs employed for monitoring the performance of FTW stormwater studies based on a review of eight existing field studies. These included designing monitoring studies as a before–after/control–treatment design; characterizing HRTs before and after FTWs are installed; quantifying nutrient uptake in plant biomass above and within the floating mat by sampling plant tissues at the start and end of each growing season; and arranging FTWs to minimize short‐circuiting.…”
Section: Constructed Stormwater Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, there is still room to optimize or otherwise enhance the performance functions of CSWs. For example, incorporating baffles (Chai et al, 2019) or optimizing FTW placement (Lucke et al, 2019) to minimize short‐circuiting, and advancing understanding of vegetation and other wetland complexities on HRT distributions through advances in modeling (Sonnenwald et al, 2019) indicated these systems can be further optimized through engineering design. Additional understanding of the role of plant functional traits and survivability in CSWs, as well as their role in attracting animals and other biota and cycling carbon, can also lead to selection of optimal “planting pallets” to jump‐start the self‐organizing capabilities of CSWs.…”
Section: Constructed Stormwater Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%