2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental demonstration of nonlinear quantum metrology with optimal quantum state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the nonclassical probe states, quantum parameterization processes based on nonlinear interactions between the probes and the to-be-measured (TBM) system, can also improve the precision by amplifying the phase imprinted by the TBM quantity to the probes. For instance, the nonlinear k-body interaction can reach a precision scaling of N −k (N −k+ 1 2 ), with (without) entanglement of the probe [11][12][13][14][15], and the nonlinear N -body entanglement generating interaction can even achieve an exponential Heisenberg limit of 2 −N for measuring its interaction strength [16]. These studies support higher than SQL scaling with N for the precision and are broadly applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Besides the nonclassical probe states, quantum parameterization processes based on nonlinear interactions between the probes and the to-be-measured (TBM) system, can also improve the precision by amplifying the phase imprinted by the TBM quantity to the probes. For instance, the nonlinear k-body interaction can reach a precision scaling of N −k (N −k+ 1 2 ), with (without) entanglement of the probe [11][12][13][14][15], and the nonlinear N -body entanglement generating interaction can even achieve an exponential Heisenberg limit of 2 −N for measuring its interaction strength [16]. These studies support higher than SQL scaling with N for the precision and are broadly applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This results in super-Heisenberg scaling for the phase estimations where ∆θ ∼ 1/n 3/2 . Experimentally, super-Heisenberg precision has only been demonstrated using a nonlinear atomic interferometer [43], and using many-body couplings in NMR [26]. Before describing how to achieve super-Heisenberg scaling for phase estimation of an unknown phase θ, using the protocol shown in Fig.…”
Section: Performing Enhanced Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F is the classical Fisher information of the distribution of measurement results given by F [{P l }] = l (∂ θ P l ) 2 /P l , ρl = ρl /P l , is the normalized reduced density matrix of the system conditioned on the measurement result l, and F Q , is the single instance QFI given above in (26). Using this form of the QFI, the Cramer Rao bound is given by…”
Section: B Quantum Fisher Information Of a Post-measurement Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(26) can keep the final states fidelity above 0.996. Then we packed the operator into one shaped pulse calculated by the gradient ascent pulse engineering (GRAPE) method [52][53][54][55], with a duration of 25 ms. The shaped pulse is designed to be robust against the inhomogeneity of the practical control field and has numerical fidelities over 0:995.…”
Section: (I) Initial State Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%