2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0308-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental cyclic response assessment of partially grouted reinforced clay brick masonry walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 13, doublewythe and Perforated bricks reinforced walls in this system are in good agreement with other reinforced systems. In walls with aspect ratios of 1 and 2, Zhang et al [32], Shabdin et al [33], Sandoval et al [34], and Farooq et al [35] showed a lower carrying capacity and displacement than double-wythe and perforated reinforced walls. Slender walls with an aspect ratio of (h=l = 2) had a better condition than this system, perhaps due to the location of steel bars in the wall.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Reinforced Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As shown in Figure 13, doublewythe and Perforated bricks reinforced walls in this system are in good agreement with other reinforced systems. In walls with aspect ratios of 1 and 2, Zhang et al [32], Shabdin et al [33], Sandoval et al [34], and Farooq et al [35] showed a lower carrying capacity and displacement than double-wythe and perforated reinforced walls. Slender walls with an aspect ratio of (h=l = 2) had a better condition than this system, perhaps due to the location of steel bars in the wall.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Reinforced Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Considering this context, the idealized envelope curve and the ductility in a load direction were calculated herein with a conservative approach. Consequently, δ u was assumed as the deformation at maximum lateral resistance (δ Vmax ), as already done in previous studies [21,28,35,37,41]. This hypothesis is based on the fact that the post-peak response of masonry shear walls exhibits large variability and represents an undesirable damage state to achieve.…”
Section: Ductilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Ramírez et al [21] and Schultz et al [22] coincided in that the wall aspect ratio and the energy dissipation capacity are inversely correlated. In any case, these contradictory results could have been influenced by how the cross-section area is considered in the shear stress calculations, as already commented by Sandoval et al [28]. For example, some experimental works on PG-RM walls reported the shear stress over the total cross-section area (gross area) and others over the net-cross section area (total area discounting the ungrouted hollows).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to recent studies [3,4], some shear estimation expressions give non-conservative results or large error ranges when assessing the resistance of bed-joint reinforced (BJR) PG-RM shear walls. In this sense, Araya-Letelier et al [5] have pointed out the need for more experimental evidence to fill out gaps in the knowledge and propose a more accurate shear design expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%