2019
DOI: 10.3390/en12132509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Comparison of Two-Level Full-SiC and Three-Level Si–SiC Quasi-Z-Source Inverters for PV Applications

Abstract: The paper presents a comparative study of two solar string inverters based on the Quasi-Z-Source (QZS) network. The first solution comprises a full-SiC two-level QZS inverter, while the second design was built based on a three-level neutral-point-clamped QZS inverter with Silicon based Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors (Si MOSFETs). Several criteria were taken into consideration: the size of passive elements, thermal design and size of heatsinks, voltage stress across semiconductors, and effic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the study, a full-SiC 2-level qZSI solution has a clear advantage over the 3-level NPC qZSI solution with Si MOSFETs, in terms of higher efficiency, along with the lower volume of the heatsink, while the volume of passive elements remains the same. The interleaved 2-level qZSI for a single-phase PV application and the control approaches, including different modulation techniques, are discussed in detail in [23][24][25][26][27]. Our work is devoted to the feasibility study of the interleaving approach in terms of size, efficiency and the overall cost of the converter.…”
Section: Description Of a Case Study System With A Quasi-z-source Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the study, a full-SiC 2-level qZSI solution has a clear advantage over the 3-level NPC qZSI solution with Si MOSFETs, in terms of higher efficiency, along with the lower volume of the heatsink, while the volume of passive elements remains the same. The interleaved 2-level qZSI for a single-phase PV application and the control approaches, including different modulation techniques, are discussed in detail in [23][24][25][26][27]. Our work is devoted to the feasibility study of the interleaving approach in terms of size, efficiency and the overall cost of the converter.…”
Section: Description Of a Case Study System With A Quasi-z-source Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers are sufficient to yield an MPPT efficiency of 99%, which is the industrial standard. The 2-level qZSI is described in [22] as a three-phase PV inverter, while the 2-level solution is compared with the 3-level NPC for a single-phase application in [23]. According to the study, a full-SiC 2-level qZSI solution has a clear advantage over the 3-level NPC qZSI solution with Si MOSFETs, in terms of higher efficiency, along with the lower volume of the heatsink, while the volume of passive elements remains the same.…”
Section: Description Of a Case Study System With A Quasi-z-source Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are only a few studies on dynamics of the complete system [6], [17] − [22]. Most of them focus on the assessment of AC network impedance performance on the DC side [18], [20], [21]. The impact of AC grid on qZSI PV power generation system dynamics is investigated in [6], [17], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13][14][15][16][17][18] a novel type of impedance network called quasi-Z-source (qZS) was proposed to overcome the limitations of the ZS network. In this topology, the input current is continuous and voltage stress on capacitors is reduced, significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%