2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Comparison of the Performance and Residual Capacity of CFFT and RC Bridge Columns Subjected to Blasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deflection of the column is smaller when columns having closely spaced transverse reinforcement subjected to the blast loading. Echevarria et al [66]. The resistance offered by the column leads towards the damage in a column against the blast loading, Kravchenko et al [67] also found that the steel ratio has a considerable effect on the column resistance to the blast impact.…”
Section: Literature On the Numerical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deflection of the column is smaller when columns having closely spaced transverse reinforcement subjected to the blast loading. Echevarria et al [66]. The resistance offered by the column leads towards the damage in a column against the blast loading, Kravchenko et al [67] also found that the steel ratio has a considerable effect on the column resistance to the blast impact.…”
Section: Literature On the Numerical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented study stems from recent studies conducted on RC and CFFT bridge columns. Recent studies have proven the CFFT system a viable alternative to conventional RC columns for bridges vulnerable to earthquake and blast hazards [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Additionally, the CFFT system has shown that it can provide increased corrosion resistance and construction benefits including accelerated construction times and increased workzone safety [26].…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional columns shown in this figure were used for blast experiments performed by UConn. The blast experiments are not discussed herein, but detailed information regarding the blast experiments can be found in Echevarria et al [21][22][23]. The steel reinforcement for the columns was placed inside their respective tubes, and spacers were used to maintain clear cover between the steel and column surfaces.…”
Section: Specimen Construction and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e failure of load-bearing columns can result in the progressive collapse of structures. erefore, it is important to improve the reliability of vulnerable columns under blasts to ensure the safety of structures [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%