2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2022.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Comparison of Pool Boiling Performance between Cu-plain Surface and Functionalized Graphene Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in 80 and 20% higher heat transfer coefficient (HTC) for CVD grown graphene and fluorinated-graphene coatings as compared to the plain copper surface (HTC = 5.3 kW/m 2 K). However, due to the increased bubble density, the CHF for CVD grown fluorinated-graphene coating is 370 kW/m 2 , which is lower than the plain copper surface (CHF = 380 kW/m 2 ), while CVD graphene shows the highest CHF of 428 kW/m 2 [6].…”
Section: Chemical Vapor Deposition (Cvd)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This resulted in 80 and 20% higher heat transfer coefficient (HTC) for CVD grown graphene and fluorinated-graphene coatings as compared to the plain copper surface (HTC = 5.3 kW/m 2 K). However, due to the increased bubble density, the CHF for CVD grown fluorinated-graphene coating is 370 kW/m 2 , which is lower than the plain copper surface (CHF = 380 kW/m 2 ), while CVD graphene shows the highest CHF of 428 kW/m 2 [6].…”
Section: Chemical Vapor Deposition (Cvd)mentioning
confidence: 89%