2013
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/22/9/094016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental comparison of bias elements for out-of-plane DEAP actuator system

Abstract: This paper presents an experimental comparison of three different biasing elements utilized to produce out-of-plane actuation for a diaphragm dielectric electro-active polymer (DEAP). A hanging mass, a linear coil spring, and a nonlinear (bistable) mechanism are individually paired with an unloaded DEAP actuator. High voltage (2.5 kV) is applied to the DEAP and the out-of-plane stroke of the DEAP is measured. The actuator stroke is notably different for each bias element. Results show that as the bias element … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For antagonistic double-cone DEA configuration, both conical membranes can be actuated separately to achieve bidirectional actuation, as has been shown by [17,20]. Despite the fact that using a bi-stable mechanism can potentially achieve a larger stroke compared to the three biasing elements aforementioned [19,21], the performance of the DEA is subjective to the specific design of the bi-stable mechanism, which makes it extremely challenging to generalize this biasing element and perform optimization, and hence it will not be studied in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For antagonistic double-cone DEA configuration, both conical membranes can be actuated separately to achieve bidirectional actuation, as has been shown by [17,20]. Despite the fact that using a bi-stable mechanism can potentially achieve a larger stroke compared to the three biasing elements aforementioned [19,21], the performance of the DEA is subjective to the specific design of the bi-stable mechanism, which makes it extremely challenging to generalize this biasing element and perform optimization, and hence it will not be studied in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design that we propose is the continuation and extension of the work previously carried out by Hodgins et al [13,14], which proposed a mechanism where the DEAs were combined with a buckled beam with a cross shape. In Hodgins et al, the buckled beam was used as a negative rate bias spring, which could improve the actuation stroke of the conical DE actuators.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The central part of the membranes is pushed out of plane by a combination of a linear spring and a negative-rate bias (NBS) spring (figure 18. The two springs and the active membrane are carefully designed to achieved the desired bistable behavior combining large stroke and large force 124 . The actuator and biasing mechanism hold in a 85 mm ⇥ 85 mm ⇥ 35 mm enclosure, and the device can lift a weight of 7.5 kg by 2.25 mm 126 .…”
Section: A Stacked Surface Expansion Actuators With a Biasing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%