2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/179/1/012015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental comparison between upsetting characteristics of porous components prepared by Fe-based sintering technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no standards for energy absorption measurement and then interpretation of results obtained for open-cell, closed-cell or syntactic metal foams, which makes the comparison of impact test data difficult. Results from static tests, such as quasistatic compression tests, are more comparable [25] to [27]. The results of the dynamic tests described in this paper were obtained at a relatively small energy impact of less than 140 J, which resulted from the test setup design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…There are no standards for energy absorption measurement and then interpretation of results obtained for open-cell, closed-cell or syntactic metal foams, which makes the comparison of impact test data difficult. Results from static tests, such as quasistatic compression tests, are more comparable [25] to [27]. The results of the dynamic tests described in this paper were obtained at a relatively small energy impact of less than 140 J, which resulted from the test setup design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%