Experimental Comparative Study between Conventional and Green Parking Lots: Analysis of Subsurface Thermal Behavior under Warm and Dry Summer Conditions

Abstract

Green infrastructure has a role to play in climate change adaptation strategies in cities. Alternative urban spaces should be designed considering new requirements in terms of urban microclimate and thermal comfort. Pervious pavements such as green parking lots can contribute to this goal through solar evaporative cooling. However, the cooling benefits of such systems remain under debate during dry and warm periods. The aim of this study was to compare experimentally the thermal behavior of different parking lot types (PLTs) with vegetated urban soil. Four parking lots were instrumented, with temperature probes buried at different depths. Underground temperatures were measured during summer 2019, and the hottest days of the period were analyzed. Results show that the less mineral used in the surface coating, the less it warms up. The temperature difference at the upper layer can reach 10 °C between mineral and non-mineral PLTs. PLTs can be grouped into three types: (i) high surface temperature during daytime and nighttime, important heat transfer toward the sublayers, and low time shift (asphalt system); (ii) high (resp. low) surface temperature during daytime (resp. nighttime), weak heat transfer toward the sublayers, and important time shift (paved stone system); and (iii) low surface temperature during daytime and nighttime, weak heat transfer toward the sublayers, and important time shift (vegetation and substrate system, wood chips system, vegetated urban soil). The results of this study underline that pervious pavements demonstrate thermal benefits under warm and dry summer conditions compared to conventional parking lot solutions. The results also indicate that the hygrothermal properties of urban materials are crucial for urban heat island mitigation.

The development of roadside green swales in the Chinese Sponge City Program: Challenges and opportunities

“…Storage devices encompass detention ponds (Yazdi and Khazaei, 2019), retention ponds (Liu et al, 2019), rainwater harvesting systems (van Dijk et al, 2020), green roofs (Bevilacqua, 2021), rain gardens (Church, 2015), and constructed wetlands (Sossalla et al, 2021). Infiltration devices include infiltration trenches (Locatelli et al, 2015), grass swales (Gavrić et al, 2019), green parking (Bouzouidja et al, 2021), permeable pavements (Hernández-Crespo et al, 2019), and infiltration basins (O'Reilly et al, 2012).…”