2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental collapse response of post-and-beam mass timber frames under a quasi-static column removal scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under catenary action, the floors are subjected to combined bending and tension and therefore understanding of the effect of such combined loading on mass timber connections is instrumental for effective modelling and performancebased design. To date some early experimental work has been performed at a substructure level [8,9], but empirical data is lacking on the behaviour of variety of connections and types of engineered wood products used in practice.…”
Section: Catenary Action In Mass Timbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under catenary action, the floors are subjected to combined bending and tension and therefore understanding of the effect of such combined loading on mass timber connections is instrumental for effective modelling and performancebased design. To date some early experimental work has been performed at a substructure level [8,9], but empirical data is lacking on the behaviour of variety of connections and types of engineered wood products used in practice.…”
Section: Catenary Action In Mass Timbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently available doweltype connectors do not allow for large deformations of beam or floors, e.g. tests of timber post-and-beam systems found that conventional connectors failed prematurely and could not develop catenary action; however, a double slotted-in steel plate connector, with elongated holes to allow joint rotation, was able to develop catenary action [4]. Support-removal tests in [5] on lap-jointed solid timber floors and walls in platform-type construction, including CLT floors, found that conventional screw connections were not able to develop catenary action.…”
Section: Floor Connectors and Catenary Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these buildings become taller, commonly reaching six storeys and more, the consequences of a potential progressive collapse event also significantly increase. Studying the progressive collapse of mass timber buildings is still a relatively new research topic, and the structural response of various types of mass timber buildings to resist such events has been researched so far, through experimental [5][6][7][8][9], analytical [10,11] or numerical [12][13][14][15] methods. However, the accuracy of the developed numerical models has not yet been verified against experimental tests, or only on component tests [15].…”
Section: Introduction 789mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such FE models have been widely used in reinforced concrete and steel structural systems [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] to gain in-depth understanding on the structural behaviour through parametric studies and identify the key factors affecting the ability of the structures to resist progressive collapse. Mass timber buildings differ from their concrete [29][30][31][32], steel [33][34][35] and composite-steel [36,37] counterparts, due to the lack of structural continuity (as built from prefabricated structural elements), the brittle failure mode of the material [38], and the typical lack of ductility of timber-to-timber connections [6,39]. These characteristics result in mass timber buildings deemed to have fewer possibilities to redistribute the load after the loss of a load bearing elements [19], outlining the necessity to develop an accurate model specific to mass timber buildings.…”
Section: Introduction 789mentioning
confidence: 99%