2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental chemo-mechanics of early-age fracture properties of cement paste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical reactions during the hydration procedure include, but are not limited to, some or all of the reactions listed below [65].…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical reactions during the hydration procedure include, but are not limited to, some or all of the reactions listed below [65].…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.19) and the chosen length parameter ℓ, the tensile strength is calculated as 1.08 N/mm 2 , which has a reasonable order of magnitude for cement paste (see e.g. the tensile strength of 3.91 N/mm 2 measured by Hoover and Ulm [66]). Fig.…”
Section: Single Edge-notched Tension Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.19), from the knowledge of the tensile strength σ c and the fracture energy G c of the given material, it is possible to calculate the length parameter ℓ, which in turn needs to be resolved through an appropriately fine mesh. Here, we employ the experimental tensile strength of the cement paste in [66] (σ c = 3.91 N/mm 2 ) along with the other mechanical properties listed in Table 4, and by using Eq. (2.19) we compute the length parameter ℓ as 0.763 mm.…”
Section: Brazilian Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [26], for instance, analyzed crack tunneling by loading the inner surface of the steel casing, and Petersen and Ulm [27] analyzed the early-age radial fracture in a cement sheath. A fracture design of setting cement requires the energy release rate G to be compared to the fracture energy G cr , for which the rate of evolution depends on the hydration degree as dG cr =dn $ 1=n [28] and we expect the interfacial fracture energy along SC and RC to show a similar trend.…”
Section: Matching the Boundary Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 shows the distribution of work done along SC and RC to reverse a microannulus, i.e., the integrands written in Eq. (28), which have been normalized with respect to the uniform distribution of the concentric geometry. 2 While the $10% increase in work done along the thicker portion of the annulus along RC (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%