2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0019896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization of a one-dimensional nonreciprocal acoustic metamaterial with anti-parallel diodes

Abstract: Characterization of a newly developed class of passive nonreciprocal acoustic metamaterials is presented in an attempt to quantify their ability of controlling the flow and distribution of acoustic energy in acoustic cavities and systems. The proposed nonreciprocal acoustic metamaterial (NAMM) cell consists of a one-dimensional acoustic cavity provided with piezoelectric flexible boundaries connected to an array of anti-parallel diodes to introduce the nonlinear damping effect that tends to break the reciproci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approaches adopted to the break the reciprocity vary from simple passive approaches to the more imaginative active means. Distinct among the passive approaches are those including constitutive nonlinearity (Liang et al, 2009;Gu et al, 2016;Merkel et al, 2018;Petrover and Baz, 2020;Raval et al, 2020), momentum bias (Fleury et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2019;Wiederhold et al, 2019), and gyroscopic coupling (Attarzadeh et al, 2019). The performance characteristics of the passive NMM are enhanced by providing them with active control capabilities as proposed, for example, by Popa and Cummer (2014), Popa et al (2015), Trainiti and Ruzzene (2016), Nasser et al (2017), Baz 2018 and Baz 2019a), Yi et al (2019), Karkar et al (2019), Zhai et al (2019) and Goldsberry et al, 2019 andGoldsberry et al, 2020. Other interesting active control approaches to break the reciprocity include the use of virtual gyroscopic controllers (Baz, 2018;Raval et al, 2021;Baz, 2022; and by introducing a unique eigen-structure tuning controller (Baz, 2020a, Baz, 2020bZhou and Baz, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches adopted to the break the reciprocity vary from simple passive approaches to the more imaginative active means. Distinct among the passive approaches are those including constitutive nonlinearity (Liang et al, 2009;Gu et al, 2016;Merkel et al, 2018;Petrover and Baz, 2020;Raval et al, 2020), momentum bias (Fleury et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2019;Wiederhold et al, 2019), and gyroscopic coupling (Attarzadeh et al, 2019). The performance characteristics of the passive NMM are enhanced by providing them with active control capabilities as proposed, for example, by Popa and Cummer (2014), Popa et al (2015), Trainiti and Ruzzene (2016), Nasser et al (2017), Baz 2018 and Baz 2019a), Yi et al (2019), Karkar et al (2019), Zhai et al (2019) and Goldsberry et al, 2019 andGoldsberry et al, 2020. Other interesting active control approaches to break the reciprocity include the use of virtual gyroscopic controllers (Baz, 2018;Raval et al, 2021;Baz, 2022; and by introducing a unique eigen-structure tuning controller (Baz, 2020a, Baz, 2020bZhou and Baz, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%