2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.12.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization of a multi-chamber alpha spectrometry system using standard actinide sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of these measurements and calculations, the detector-source distances with the best efficiency values were determined for both alpha detectors. The same information about the measured efficiency is shown in Figure 5, where we see that the detector efficiency depends on the measurement geometry and the detector-source distances (Calin et al, 2013b). Therefore, it is concluded that the detector-source distance should be as small as possible in order to obtain high measurement efficiency.…”
Section: The Determination Of the Alpha Detector Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As a result of these measurements and calculations, the detector-source distances with the best efficiency values were determined for both alpha detectors. The same information about the measured efficiency is shown in Figure 5, where we see that the detector efficiency depends on the measurement geometry and the detector-source distances (Calin et al, 2013b). Therefore, it is concluded that the detector-source distance should be as small as possible in order to obtain high measurement efficiency.…”
Section: The Determination Of the Alpha Detector Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The differences in the efficiency for the different source-toscintillator distances result from geometrical factors. This is because the efficiency of the detector is constant regardless of the detected alpha particle's energy [10]. The differences observed in the measurements and Monte Carlo simulations might be attributed to the inhomogeneity of the Am-241 source and the Ce:GAGG scintillator, and errors in the geometrical parameters such as source radius, scintillator thickness, and source-to-scintillator distance.…”
Section: Jinst 16 C12017mentioning
confidence: 96%