2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterisation of load responses to failure of a RC frame and a NSM CFRP RC frame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike steel bars, the FRP bars behave anisotropic, non-homogeneous, and linear elastic properties, which may result in different force transfer mechanisms between bars and concrete. Some research on the performance of FRP-RC members [1,2] or structures [3,4] purport that the bond stress (τ)-slip (s) relationship differs greatly between that of FRP bars and that of steel bars, notably influencing the usability of the concrete structure. Contrarily, unlike steel bars, no uniform manufacturing standards have been established for FRP bars, resulting in divergences between the performance of FPR bars across different countries and manufacturers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike steel bars, the FRP bars behave anisotropic, non-homogeneous, and linear elastic properties, which may result in different force transfer mechanisms between bars and concrete. Some research on the performance of FRP-RC members [1,2] or structures [3,4] purport that the bond stress (τ)-slip (s) relationship differs greatly between that of FRP bars and that of steel bars, notably influencing the usability of the concrete structure. Contrarily, unlike steel bars, no uniform manufacturing standards have been established for FRP bars, resulting in divergences between the performance of FPR bars across different countries and manufacturers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%