1906
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1906.25210080012002c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Cerebrospinal Meningitis and Its Serum Treatment.

Abstract: lation with the continuous coaxing of the digestive tract, and the constant tempting of the palate to achieA-e the desired result. Not only for an esthetic effect, but also as a prophylactic and curatiA-e means, the logical fattening of individuals is of an importance which can hardly be overestimated.We know practically nothing about the ways in which proteins are held in living protoplasmic structures. The molecules of the protein compounds are relatively so large that as yet our physicochemical methods of m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

1907
1907
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The inability of MAb to modify the course of infection if given after a certain time is consistent with earlier observations made for other pathogens such as Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae, animals infected with which could not be saved if antibody treatment was delayed for more than a few hours (8,15). However, it is noteworthy that in the preantibiotic era, clinically useful sera were often ineffective in the therapy of established infection in animal models (8,15,34). Thus, antibody therapeutic ineffectiveness in animal models of established infection does not preclude therapeutic usefulness in human infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The inability of MAb to modify the course of infection if given after a certain time is consistent with earlier observations made for other pathogens such as Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae, animals infected with which could not be saved if antibody treatment was delayed for more than a few hours (8,15). However, it is noteworthy that in the preantibiotic era, clinically useful sera were often ineffective in the therapy of established infection in animal models (8,15,34). Thus, antibody therapeutic ineffectiveness in animal models of established infection does not preclude therapeutic usefulness in human infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In the early part of the 20th century, the American physician Simon Flexner reported on the use of antimeningococcal serum therapy, first in an animal model and subsequently in humans, demonstrating that intrathecal administration reduced the mortality of meningococcal meningitis (111)(112)(113)(114). In 1915, a serogrouping scheme was proposed that separated meningococcal isolates into types I to IV (later changed to the letter-based nomenclature that is used today), which eventually was adopted in the United States (140,365).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum therapy for meningococcal infections was developed by Jochmann (64) (48). Administration of antimeningococcal serum directly into the subarachnoid space shortly after infection cured the majority of treated monkeys (46,47,97).…”
Section: Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the intratracheal model, direct administration of pneumococci into the lower airways circumvents defenses in the nose and upper airways. Similarly, antimeningococcal sera were developed primary by using the monkey model of intraspinal infection (46)(47)(48)(49)(50), which cannot be considered physiological because the bacteria and the serum were introduced directly into the subarachnoid space. Despite little relevance to the pathogenesis of disease in humans, each of these models was effective at identifying potentially useful antibodies for human therapy.…”
Section: Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%