2015
DOI: 10.1021/jp511163y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Benchmark Data and Systematic Evaluation of Two a Posteriori, Polarizable-Continuum Corrections for Vertical Excitation Energies in Solution

Abstract: We report the implementation and evaluation of a perturbative, density-based correction scheme for vertical excitation energies calculated in the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM). Because the proposed first-order correction terms depend solely on the zeroth-order excited-state density, a transfer of the approach to any configuration interaction-type excited-state method is straightforward. Employing the algebraic-diagrammatic construction (ADC) scheme of up to third order as well as time-depend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
232
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(179 reference statements)
3
232
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, one could employ long‐range corrected/range‐separated functionals such as CAM‐B3LYP. To estimate the impact of a typical nonpolar and polar solvent onto relaxed excited‐state energies, we employed the difference‐density based, non‐equilibrium implementation of COSMO as implemented in ORCA with the dielectric constant ( ϵ ) and optical dielectric constant (squared refractive index, n 2 ) set to 2 and 10, respectively (see the caption of Table and the Supporting Information for details on this approach) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, one could employ long‐range corrected/range‐separated functionals such as CAM‐B3LYP. To estimate the impact of a typical nonpolar and polar solvent onto relaxed excited‐state energies, we employed the difference‐density based, non‐equilibrium implementation of COSMO as implemented in ORCA with the dielectric constant ( ϵ ) and optical dielectric constant (squared refractive index, n 2 ) set to 2 and 10, respectively (see the caption of Table and the Supporting Information for details on this approach) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated UV‐Vis spectra showed a good agreement with the experiment and calculations performed by Pellegrin et al for the anchors 1, 2, and 4 for the Ruthenium metal ion (Figures S1 and S2). Recently, the ss‐cLRPCM solvent model have been used by different researchers for TDDFT calculations that showed better results . We have also employed the ss‐cLRPCM solvent model, but no major differences are found in the excitation energies or HOMO and Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) of the considered systems (Table S2).…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting diffuse functions induced significant variations (increase in the mean error from 0.03 to 0.14 eV) while going from triple-to double-ζ introduced only minor changes (decrease in the mean error from 0.03 to 0.01 eV) for singlet excited states. Very recently, the same group investigated several variations of the ADC approach in the framework of a solvatochromic benchmark [49]. The impact of the BS [(aug-)cc-pVDZ and (aug-)cc-pVTZ] has been investigated for nitrobenzene, a charge-transfer molecule.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%