2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Behavior of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns Using Ultrahigh-Strength Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many quasi‐static cyclic loading tests have been conducted to investigate the seismic behavior of conventional circular CFST columns, but they concentrated mainly on NS concrete and NS steel . Meanwhile, Elremaily and Azizinamini studied the seismic behavior of six circular CFST columns with a concrete cylinder compressive strength varying from 40 to 104 MPa and NS steel ( f y = 372 MPa) with D / t ratios of 51 and 34.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many quasi‐static cyclic loading tests have been conducted to investigate the seismic behavior of conventional circular CFST columns, but they concentrated mainly on NS concrete and NS steel . Meanwhile, Elremaily and Azizinamini studied the seismic behavior of six circular CFST columns with a concrete cylinder compressive strength varying from 40 to 104 MPa and NS steel ( f y = 372 MPa) with D / t ratios of 51 and 34.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Elremaily and Azizinamini studied the seismic behavior of six circular CFST columns with a concrete cylinder compressive strength varying from 40 to 104 MPa and NS steel ( f y = 372 MPa) with D / t ratios of 51 and 34. Skalomenos et al investigated the hysteretic behavior of three circular CFST columns ( D / t = 25) with f c values between 42.4 and 82.3 MPa and f y values varying from 387 to 788 MPa. Their studies revealed that the use of HS steel tubes could provide a larger elastic deformation capacity and a better confining effect than NS steel tubes under small‐ D / t ratios and that HS core concrete could delay local buckling until the occurrence of a large rotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is noteworthy that no HS materials were adopted in their tests [20][21][22]. On the other hand, the aforementioned researches [15][16][17][18] mainly aim at hysteretic behavior of the traditional concrete-filled thickwalled steel tubular columns using HS materials. Therefore, more experimental studies are needed to examine the hysteretic performance of CFTST columns using HS materials, namely the HCFTST columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varma et al [16,17] examined the seismic behavior of HS square CFST columns filled with HS concrete (fc =110 MPa) and steel yield strength (fy) ranging from 269 to 660 MPa. Skalomenos et al [18] investigated the hysteretic behavior of circular and square CFST columns with fc varying from 42.4 to 82.3 MPa and fy varying from 387 to 788 MPa. For the CFST columns, the HS steel tube can provide a larger elastic deformation capacity and better confined effect, while the application of HS core concrete can delay local buckling of steel tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation