2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental assessment of interference resistance for a Series 60 catamaran in free and fixed trim-sinkage conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the longest separation of S/L=0.33 is sunken among the others that expresses a good sign meaning the wider transversal distance (bigger S/L ratio) contributes to reducing the ship resistance, together with the hump depletion. This effect was also described by Souto-Iglesias et al [13].…”
Section: Resistance Curves For All Configurationssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the longest separation of S/L=0.33 is sunken among the others that expresses a good sign meaning the wider transversal distance (bigger S/L ratio) contributes to reducing the ship resistance, together with the hump depletion. This effect was also described by Souto-Iglesias et al [13].…”
Section: Resistance Curves For All Configurationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Because of this practical, using the total resistance coefficient will cut-out some denominators like friction, wave, and other components in the calculation. Hence, the interference factor IF is expressed by: (4) Where CT (P) is the total resistance coefficient of pentamaran model and CT (M) is the total resistance coefficient of non-interference pentamaran or the sum of individual total resistance of every hull.The value of the interference factor, principally, have to be at minimum; negative if possible [13].…”
Section: Interference Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graph trend of the total drag coefficient (Ct) from both tests experienced a sloping downward trend to Froude Number (Fn) 0.43, then experienced a steep decline afterwards. According to Souto-Iglesias et al (2012) this occurs due to the interference factor of wave resistance, form resistance, and viscosity. The graph trend of the total drag coefficient (Ct) to the variation of the clearance distance (S/L) decreased along with the increase in clearance (S/L).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the parameters, various cases are studied by varying the Froud number, the breadth of each hull and their separation. The range of separation values is chosen to be 0.2~0.5 based on the information given by reference (Thomas et al, 2011;Souto-Iglesias et al, 2012 for real Catamarans.…”
Section: Fig 22 Computational Domain Of a Trimaranmentioning
confidence: 99%