1961
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1961.63.4.02a00070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Archeology1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was also noted that archaeological experiments seek to imitate past cultural patterning, whereas the Baconian experimental model was designed for modelling natural phenomena, and the two are thus, at some level, fundamentally different (e.g. Ascher 1961: 807, Coles 1979: 246, Henry 2002. Coles (1979: 243) also pragmatically acknowledged the inability of an archaeological experimental approach to provide absolute proof in relating reproduced materials to archaeological examples.…”
Section: -Theory In Experimental Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was also noted that archaeological experiments seek to imitate past cultural patterning, whereas the Baconian experimental model was designed for modelling natural phenomena, and the two are thus, at some level, fundamentally different (e.g. Ascher 1961: 807, Coles 1979: 246, Henry 2002. Coles (1979: 243) also pragmatically acknowledged the inability of an archaeological experimental approach to provide absolute proof in relating reproduced materials to archaeological examples.…”
Section: -Theory In Experimental Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, findings from this study contribute to this important body of research; however methodologically it is set apart as we utilize principles grounded in experimental archaeology (e.g. Ascher, 1961;Callahan, 1995;Coles, 1973;Kelterborn, 2005;Schindler, 2006) by using the same materials, techniques, and strategies believed to have been used in the past in structured experimentation to assess the affects of detoxification on arrow arum starch. In using this approach, the authors recognize that precision may have been sacrificed in their ability to control for external variables; yet, it is felt that greater historical accuracy was achieved as each of the processing activities involved the use of techniques and technologies commonly encountered in the ethnographic and archaeological record.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental archaeology seeks to provide the Middle Range research that connects physical artifacts with past processes, using modern observable processes as analogs (Gifford-Gonzalez, 1991).Using experimental archaeology methods designed to develop and test hypotheses about artifact patterning have a long history in archaeology (Ascher, 1961;Semenov, 1964), and researchers of Pleistocene archaeological sites have often been at the forefront (Isaac, 1971;Toth and Schick, 1983;Frison, 1989). Since nearly every archaeological context is a palimpsest of site use to some degree (Foley, 1981), Schiffer (1987) argues that inference must begin by identifying both cultural and natural processes that formed the archaeological record.…”
Section: Middle Range Theory: Artifact Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%