2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and theoretical investigation of surface temperature non-uniformity of spray cooling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al [12] measured the spray cooling efficiency of the spray system and concluded that to achieve the maximum CHF while using the minimum quantity of water, it is suggested to select nozzles that produce droplets diameter as small as possible and droplets velocity as high as possible. Cheng et al [13][14][15][16] studied the effect of spray flow rate (range from 26.7 mL/min to 91.7 mL/min) on surface temperature experimentally and numerically. They found that with the increase of spray flow rate, the film thickness and the surface temperature decreased accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [12] measured the spray cooling efficiency of the spray system and concluded that to achieve the maximum CHF while using the minimum quantity of water, it is suggested to select nozzles that produce droplets diameter as small as possible and droplets velocity as high as possible. Cheng et al [13][14][15][16] studied the effect of spray flow rate (range from 26.7 mL/min to 91.7 mL/min) on surface temperature experimentally and numerically. They found that with the increase of spray flow rate, the film thickness and the surface temperature decreased accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooling site is subjected to convective heat transfer during spray cooling, and an average heat transfer coefficient, h s , over the entire sprayed area is used and assumed to be constant. However, it is well known that the heat transfer coefficient at the sprayed surface is non-uniform and varies between central and peripheral locations [149][150][151][152][153]. To overcome this issue, our preliminary case study considered the spatial distribution of the heat transfer coefficient over the target skin surface.…”
Section: Physical Model and Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature field of the top‐blown submerged gas‐liquid two‐phase mixing process belongs to the non‐steady‐state temperature field. Temperature field is one of the most convenient parameters commonly used to study heat transfer [19], [20], especially in the study of multiphase heat transfer [21–23]. In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the temperature field uniformity and non‐uniformity [24–26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%