1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2860(97)00199-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and theoretical exploration of photodissociation of SO2 via the C̃1B2 state: identification of the dissociation pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
142
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
7
142
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 165 to 235 nm wavelength region, SO 2 photolysis occurs through pre-dissociation from the bound C( 1 B 2 ) state. Near the dissociation threshold of 218.7 nm (Becker et al, 1995), the quantum yield of photolysis is less than unity, although it increases to greater than 0.99 at wavelengths shorter than 215 nm (Katagiri et al, 1997). In the region where the quantum yield is close to unity (i.e., less than 215 nm), the isotope effects due to SO 2 photolysis should be determined entirely by the differences in the absorption cross sections between the different isotopologues of SO 2 (e.g., by isotopologue specific Franck-Condon coupling) ( Potential energy profiles on the singlet (red) and triplet (blue) potential energy surfaces for the SO 3 system obtained using B3LYP optimization followed by UCCSD(T)-F12a single point calculation, with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set.…”
Section: Origin Of Mass-independent Fractionation During So 2 Photochmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the 165 to 235 nm wavelength region, SO 2 photolysis occurs through pre-dissociation from the bound C( 1 B 2 ) state. Near the dissociation threshold of 218.7 nm (Becker et al, 1995), the quantum yield of photolysis is less than unity, although it increases to greater than 0.99 at wavelengths shorter than 215 nm (Katagiri et al, 1997). In the region where the quantum yield is close to unity (i.e., less than 215 nm), the isotope effects due to SO 2 photolysis should be determined entirely by the differences in the absorption cross sections between the different isotopologues of SO 2 (e.g., by isotopologue specific Franck-Condon coupling) ( Potential energy profiles on the singlet (red) and triplet (blue) potential energy surfaces for the SO 3 system obtained using B3LYP optimization followed by UCCSD(T)-F12a single point calculation, with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set.…”
Section: Origin Of Mass-independent Fractionation During So 2 Photochmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the narrow spectral region from 215 to 218.7 nm, where the quantum yield of photodissociation varies, it is possible that quantum yield differences between isotopologues could potentially produce additional isotope effects beyond those predicted from absorption cross sections. However, in this region, photodissociation occurs primarily via vibronic mixing of the C( 1 B 2 ) state levels with dissociative continuum of the electronic ground, X( 1 A 1 ) state (Katagiri et al, 1997). Due to the high density of vibronic levels for the X( 1 A 1 ) state, it is unlikely that there will be significant isotope effects in the coupling strength between the C( 1 B 2 ) and X( 1 A 1 ) states.…”
Section: Origin Of Mass-independent Fractionation During So 2 Photochmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panels (a) and (b) show the singlet and triplet state ionisation pathways, respectively. The schematic diabatic potential energy curves were adapted from the results of the ab initio calculations with the exception of the (2) 1 A 1 state which was adapted from the works of Kamiya and Matsui 8 and Katagiri et al 93 In contrast to the other potential curves shown, this surface represents the adiabatic potential leading to the first 1 u state at linearity. The ionisation pathways thought to lead to SO + 2 photoelectron bands (1), (2), (3), and (1 ) are denoted by the "e − (1)," "e − (2)," "e − (3)," and "e − (1 )" arrows, respectively.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isotope effects due primarily to absorption, as predicted by isotopologue-specific cross-sections, do not contribute significantly to the large S-MIF observed, particularly in 36 S. Rapid vibrational relaxation allows expression of S-MIF signatures from localized accidental degeneracies regardless of the initially excited vibronic level. The same mechanism, however, may not be applied to the 180-and 220-nm band systems of SO 2 because the quantum efficiency of photolysis is near unity below 205 nm (59), and the lifetime is sufficiently short that little vibrational relaxation occurs. Although the S-MIF signatures observed in this study, particularly the Δ 36 S/Δ 33 S ratios, do not match those from the Archean, the photochemistry in the photoexcitation band can produce large mass-independent signatures (i.e., Δ 33 S values) with relatively small mass-dependent fractionations (i.e., δ 34 S values), which is necessary to explain the preservation of large Archean S-MIF signatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%