2004
DOI: 10.1086/421987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Theoretical Evaluation of Density‐sensitive Nvi, Arxiv, and FexxiiLine Ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the electron density n e = 5.6 × 10 10 cm −3 is derived. This result is consistent with value 6.0×10 10 cm −3 recently diagnosed by Chen et al [34] using triplet line intensity ratio of He-like N ion. Table 2 shows the diagnosed electron densities of the EBIT-II plasma from different line ratios.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1, the electron density n e = 5.6 × 10 10 cm −3 is derived. This result is consistent with value 6.0×10 10 cm −3 recently diagnosed by Chen et al [34] using triplet line intensity ratio of He-like N ion. Table 2 shows the diagnosed electron densities of the EBIT-II plasma from different line ratios.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The residual gas pressure is lower than 10 −11 mbar. Together with an electron density n e ≤ 10 12 cm −3 (Chen et al 2004), the conditions approximate the dilute plasma conditions of the solar corona.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In general, the trapped ions have a wider distribution compared with the electron beam as reported in several previous studies (Gillaspy et al 1995;Chen et al 2004;Silver et al 2000;Liang et al 2009b;Nakamura et al 2011). The effective density n eff e therefore becomes smaller than the geometrical density n g e .…”
Section: Electron Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In most of the previous measurements performed on EBITs, theoretically estimated electron-ion overlap factor have been used to derive electron densities and thus corresponding density sensitive line ratios (Liang et al 2009a,b;Chen et al 2004;Yamamotto et al 2008). This resulted in uncertainties in the measured electron density values.…”
Section: Experiments and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%