2010
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.26.815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Theoretical Characterization of an AC Electroosmotic Micromixer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of mixer, however, requires extra fabrication steps and additional experimental setup often (Hsiung et al 2007;Niu et al 2006). Active micromixers can be categorized according to external energy inputs: acoustic disturbance (Frommelt et al 2008;Ahmed et al 2009;Yaralioglu et al 2004), dielectrophoretic disturbance (Gadish and Voldman 2006;Lee and Voldman 2007), asymmetric post arrays (Hsiung et al 2007;Wang et al 2007), electrohydrodynamic instability (El Moctar et al 2003), electroosmotic disturbance (Sasaki et al 2006(Sasaki et al , 2010, static magnetic field (Goet et al 2009), magnetic immobilization of magnetic beads (Hirschberg et al 2009;LundOlesen et al 2008), and electrokinetically driven mixing (Lee et al 2004;Yan et al 2009;Wu and Li 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of mixer, however, requires extra fabrication steps and additional experimental setup often (Hsiung et al 2007;Niu et al 2006). Active micromixers can be categorized according to external energy inputs: acoustic disturbance (Frommelt et al 2008;Ahmed et al 2009;Yaralioglu et al 2004), dielectrophoretic disturbance (Gadish and Voldman 2006;Lee and Voldman 2007), asymmetric post arrays (Hsiung et al 2007;Wang et al 2007), electrohydrodynamic instability (El Moctar et al 2003), electroosmotic disturbance (Sasaki et al 2006(Sasaki et al , 2010, static magnetic field (Goet et al 2009), magnetic immobilization of magnetic beads (Hirschberg et al 2009;LundOlesen et al 2008), and electrokinetically driven mixing (Lee et al 2004;Yan et al 2009;Wu and Li 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AC voltage applied to the electrodes was 20 V, and frequency varied from 1 to 5 kHz. The results showed that the higher the electrode voltage, the higher the mixing efficiency; a maximum mixing efficiency of 92% was achieved at 1 kHz. Huang et al presented a novel mixing technique using a four‐phase travelling‐wave electrode array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sasaki et al (25) describe the development of an electroosmotic micromixer. In this study, on the bottom surface of a channel, a pair of electrodes having a sinusoidal inter electrode gap was arranged in parallel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%