2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Theoretical Assessments of Aluminum Proximity in MFI Zeolites and Its Alteration by Organic and Inorganic Structure-Directing Agents

Abstract: The molecular structure and cationic charge density of organic and inorganic structure-directing agents (SDAs) influence the siting and arrangement of Al substituted in zeolite frameworks. Yet, developing robust synthesis−structure relations for MFI zeolites is difficult because of the complexities inherent to its low-symmetry framework (12 unique tetrahedral sites), which generates a large combinatorial space of Al−Al site pairs to exhaustively model by density functional theory (DFT) and quantify by experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
117
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
7
117
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only distributions within 100 kJ/mol of the most stable configuration (ID 28) are displayed. The calculations indicate that the adsorption of Co 2+ in d6runits with paired aluminum sites is the most favorable configuration, for which the Co-exchange is known to be favorable(80). The calculated energies are in quantitative agreement with previous studies(43).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Only distributions within 100 kJ/mol of the most stable configuration (ID 28) are displayed. The calculations indicate that the adsorption of Co 2+ in d6runits with paired aluminum sites is the most favorable configuration, for which the Co-exchange is known to be favorable(80). The calculated energies are in quantitative agreement with previous studies(43).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Especially for the low-symmetry MFI this is important, as it was recently calculated theoretically that numerous (5-or 6-membered rings based) acid site duo's have feasible exchange energies for divalent cobalt. 10 To validate our probe, we demonstrate the presence of almost solely Co 2+ (H2O)6 after room temperature DCC exchange on variable samples. Diffuse reflectance UV-vis absorption spectra (Figure S8) demonstrate the presence of Co 2+ ions as hexa-aqua complexes (absorption band with a maximum at 19 400 and a shoulder at 20 400 cm -1 ) 83,84 and suggests the absence of significant amounts of cobalt oxides (typically between 25.000-33.000 cm -1 ) 83,85 in both a crystalline sample…”
Section: Evaluation Of Acid Sites Distribution In Izc Via Divalent Cation Capacity (Dcc)mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Most recent studies on short-range Al distributions have deduced 'thermodynamic' synthesis outcomes based on localized charge balances at the cage level between a positively charged (organic) structure-directing agent (O)SDA and the negatively charged framework from either aluminum or defect sites. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Furthermore, Al separation rules such as Löwenstein rule 16 or Dempsey's rule 17 and the intrinsic thermodynamic preference of Al for particular T-sites (framework dependent) 18 also seem to influence the short-range Al distribution in synthesized zeolites, despite the strong influence of kinetic processes during zeolite crystallization. 19,20 The use of alternative Si and Al sources −and other recipe alterations− may provoke Al distribution outcomes unexpected from a charge-balancing perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T12-site is the most frequently chosen site for aluminum substitution due to its presence at the interception of the straight and sinusoidal channels of MFI [71][72][73] and the lowest energy among all 12 T-sites, 74,75 T2-site is also located at the interception of channels 75,76 and is energetically comparable to T12-site for aluminum incorporation. 75 Additionally, the energetically most favorable T-site for the P-active site is unknown. As such, calculations were performed and compared on both T2 and T12-sites for both set of sites (Al-, and P-) to choose the most representative T-site for adsorption energy calculations.…”
Section: Adsorption Energy Calculations Using Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%