The load‐bearing capacity and failure characteristics of composite structures are closely related to their dimensions. In this study, low‐velocity impact, ultrasonic non‐destructive testing, and compression after impact tests were conducted on composite laminates of varying widths to investigate the influence of size effects. Distinct impact response profiles and compression failure modes were characterized. The results indicate that under impact loading, the delamination threshold load (6700 N ~ 7200 N) and the knee‐point energy (40 J) are not affected by width. However, variations in width lead to differences in indentation depth, impact duration, peak load, delamination characteristics, and energy absorption. Furthermore, increasing impact energy further magnifies these differences. Under compression loading, wider laminates exhibit lower residual strength, with the influence of impact energy on residual strength decreasing as width increases. Importantly, the observed compression failure deformation mode transitions from localized buckling to widespread sub‐layer delamination‐induced compression failure. This suggests that changes in width alter the governing mechanical mechanisms of CAI failure. Consequently, the use of a single‐size laminate to represent both LVI and CAI processes is not recommended. Based on experimental results, the reliability of the equivalent damage method in predicting the residual compression strength of laminates of different widths was confirmed, providing valuable insights for practical engineering applications.Highlights
Assess the variations in the low‐velocity impact process of laminates with different widths.
Evaluate the delamination damage of laminates after impacts by ultrasonic C‐scan techniques.
Investigate the effect of variation in widths on the compression behavior of laminates after impact.
Validate the feasibility of equivalent damage modeling for calculating residual strength.
