2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and simulation study of foam stability and the effects on hydraulic fracture proppant placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characterization of foams is utterly dependent on the size of the bubbles. The foam quality in which the bubble size is defined as the average diameter of the bubbles (it might be varied regarding the properties of the foam and the distribution of the bubbles and for colloidal sizes is about 0.01-0.1 µm) and foam quality is considered as the percentage of the fraction of gas volumes in the generated foam that ranges from 75% to 90% [20][21][22]. Yu et al (2015) proposed a numerical method to simulate the carbon dioxide in a tight formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterization of foams is utterly dependent on the size of the bubbles. The foam quality in which the bubble size is defined as the average diameter of the bubbles (it might be varied regarding the properties of the foam and the distribution of the bubbles and for colloidal sizes is about 0.01-0.1 µm) and foam quality is considered as the percentage of the fraction of gas volumes in the generated foam that ranges from 75% to 90% [20][21][22]. Yu et al (2015) proposed a numerical method to simulate the carbon dioxide in a tight formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foam stability with the addition of silica nanoparticles was improvised by slowing the foam decay ratio. The enhanced stability resulted from both a reduction in the extent of free drainage due to increases in the aqueous phase viscosity as well as the adsorption of particles around bubbles to prevent coalescences and disproportion. , Higher temperature (80 °C) shows faster decay compared to that at 30 °C due to increased kinetic energy of the molecules as well as reduced base fluid viscosity. However, the foam decay process was very slow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon (the decreasing foam stability and apparent viscosity with increasing foam quality) has been attributed to increasing frequency of bubble collisions and Oswald ripening due to high percentages of dispersed gas per unit volume of the foaming solutions (Osei-Bonsu et al 2016). The higher gas volume per unit volume of surfactant solutions at higher foam quality results in dynamic and recurrent interaction within the foamy fluids, consequently increasing the rate of gas diffusion from lamellae, bubble coalescence and coarsening (Fei et al 2017;Yekeen et al 2018b).…”
Section: Influence Of Foam Quality On the Apparent Viscosities Of Lb And Sio 2 -Lb Foamsmentioning
confidence: 99%