2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-014-3021-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and simulation study for ultrathin (∼100 μm) mono crystalline silicon solar cell with 156×156 mm2 area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Sheoran et al 32 reported that the temperature of 115 μm thick wafers was 70 °C higher than that of 280 μm thick ones, for the same belt furnace temperature. Do et al 25 and Schiele et al 26 , that developed 100 μm thick devices, did not comment about the firing temperature used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Sheoran et al 32 reported that the temperature of 115 μm thick wafers was 70 °C higher than that of 280 μm thick ones, for the same belt furnace temperature. Do et al 25 and Schiele et al 26 , that developed 100 μm thick devices, did not comment about the firing temperature used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these structures can achieve high efficiencies, several processing steps are needed and the manufacturing process may be not cost-effective. Otherwise, large area PERC devices, that is, without diffusion on the rear face and both faces passivated by SiN x :H, were produced using 100 μm thick p-type Si wafers and reached the efficiency of 16.8% 25 . Thin n-type solar cells with whole rear face covered by aluminum achieved the efficiency of 18% and 19% for homogenous and selective phosphorus front surface field 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The J sc value of the record-efficiency c-Si solar cell is indicated by an arrow 6 . (b-g) Sketches of notable light-trapping schemes used in state-of-the-art thin and ultrathin c-Si cells: (b) micron-scale random pyramids 10,12213,20,[121][122][123][124][125][126] , (c) front inverted nanopyramid arrays 21,22 , (d) amorphous ordered nanopatterning 23 , (e) slanted cones 29 , (f) front and back nanocone arrays 27 and (g) photonic crystals 31 In the sub-10 µm range, three noticeable experimental works have demonstrated a shortcircuit current density exceeding double-pass absorption 21,22,23 . Their common light-trapping strategy is based on the use of a sub-micrometer front texturing of silicon coupled with a metal back reflector.…”
Section: Box 1: Light-trapping In Solar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com silício tipo p crescido pela técnica Czochralski (Cz) e estruturas n + p tipo PERC (passivated emitter rear contact), isto é, sem campo retrodifusor na face posterior e evitando-se assim a camada de alumínio, Do et al [4] produziram células solares de 156 mm x 156 mm com eficiência de 16,8 %. Usando lâminas de silício FZ (float zone), tipo p, de 130 μm de espessura, Lee e colaboradores [5] reportaram eficiências de 17,2 % para estruturas PERC e de 16,2 % para estruturas convencionais com alumínio na face posterior.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified