2007
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and simulation analysis of community structure of nitrifying bacteria in a membrane-aerated biofilm

Abstract: Until now, only few attempts have been made to assess biofilm models simulating microenvironments in a biofilm. As a first step, we compare the microenvironment observed in a membrane aerated biofilm (MAB) to that derived from a two-dimensional computational model with individual ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) embedded in a continuum EPS matrix. Gradients of oxygen were determined by means of microelectrodes. The change in nitrifying bacterial populations with the biofilm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The granule samples were fixed with a freshly prepared solution of 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 18 h at 4°C (26). They were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and subsequently dispersed using an ultrasonic homogenizer for analysis of the population dynamics.…”
Section: Fixation and Cryosectioning Of Granule Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The granule samples were fixed with a freshly prepared solution of 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 18 h at 4°C (26). They were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and subsequently dispersed using an ultrasonic homogenizer for analysis of the population dynamics.…”
Section: Fixation and Cryosectioning Of Granule Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, this process results in the development of a mature biofilm, in which cells cluster in pillar-and mushroom-like structures with water channels between them, forming a primitive circulatory system (Kolter & Losick, 1998). In other cases, more compact, flat and homogeneous biofilm layers (Heydorn et al, 2000;Picioreanu et al, 2000), spherical clusters (Matsumoto et al, 2007), discrete microcolony structures (Massol-Deyá et al, 1995), ball-shaped microcolonies (Tolker-Nielsen et al, 2000) and honeycomb-like structures (Marsh et al, 2003;Russo et al, 2006) have been reported. Although it is out of the scope of this paper to extensively review the different biofilm structures reported, it is generally accepted that biofilms are not a continuous monolayer surface deposit but instead a thin base film, ranging from a patchy monolayer of cells to a film several layers thick (Stoodley et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Multispecies 1-dimensional modeling has also been examined by Shanahan and Semmens (2004) and Terada et al (2007). A recent development has been the application of spatially structured biofilm modeling to the MABR (Matsumoto et al, 2007). This approach can be useful in the analysis of structure-function relationship and the spatial dynamics of microbial populations in stratified biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%